> Wow, you are a caustic individual. Huge Chuckle. Several clubs and dozens of dancers have all commented that I'm one of the nicest customers they deal with.
The ones who don't think I'm nice are numerous ROBs. They avoid me like the plague.
If you present an unreasoned assertion, it is not caustic to point out that the emperor is wearing no clothes.
> What prompts you to question my assertion, or the girl's honesty?
What prompts me on your assertion? Knowledge of 3rd grade level mathematics. There is no way a dancer is going to earn $2000 on a shift doing $20 dances.
With $100+ dances, sure. (40second $20 mini-LDs in Ultra room booth, cabana dances, booth dances) I know dancers who post that kind of a number on occasion in SF clubs and more often in Vegas (on certain weeks). Every single one of them do not look at $20 dances as core "money makers" if their goal is $1000+/night.
The dancer could have had $2000 at one point in the evening. She certainly was doing more than entry level LDs to rake in that much money though. $20 LDs was not the principle cause of why she had that much money. Also know enough about the MBOT in the era you are talking about to know that she has likely holding cash that she would need to flip back into dance chips later in the evening. So again, not quite the amount of money you are trying to portray it as being commonly take home cash.
> And, WhyTF would anyone be advocating $40 LDs?
Not sure. I wasn't. The $40 was chosen for two reasons (since apparently reading comprehension deficient also. )
i. To be more representative of the average dance price charged. Choosing $20 would have just more attention to the dubious proposition of having to dance for 8 hours straight get that much money.
$40 is still likely too low a average charged price number but didn't want to focus on what it was exactly.
ii. To drive home the point just how many new customers you need when folks when folks want to chop the prices back down to 1992 levels. Granted the MBOT went on a "great white whale" kick with the $50 LD prices which relied on almost a 1-sucker-a-day. But even back in flush economic times (dotcom era) they'd be hard pressed to move more than 1,000 customers per shift through the place.
Similarly, much simpler math and mapping to number of customers required if drop to $1000/shift in gross revenue ( 25 customers/shift which is only very high.... not stupid crazy high. )
Going from $15 to $5 is a 66% cut in revenue. To trend water they'd need a 45-66% increases in customer foot traffic to offset that (depending on how well the dancers can upsell a smaller increase in customers into high end dances.).