Man, I didn't even bother getting an LD with Mya after seeing her stage-show - I was the only one tipping stage-side on a very slow Saturday - the interaction with her onstage was enough of a warm-up - it was straight to the back - and she was delightful.

Gorgeous sexy woman!

SR

http://www.myredbook.com/showpro.aspx?org=2931

>Actually, I am imploring you to contribute!

and if folks submitted reviews instead of defacto putting them in the forums why wouldn't the 411 already be here in more appropriate searchable/sortable form ? How does this spreadsheet make RB better?

How about, more user control of the information; more selective slice and dice possibilities. or potentially an online user-maintened MySql database-could provide more granularity to info for drill-down queries, etc.

OK, your turn; don't be shy, but make it positive for a change.

How about don't rip off RB.

Put your reviews in the system that RB provided. RB has already provided an interface to a database. For summary information access it is now free and has proven track record (has existed for years).

If you find value in more fine grain searching that RB provides then PAY FOR IT. (instead of ripping off RB. )

If you want your own private copy of RB review data, then copy it YOURSELF in to your own spreadsheet (if you find no flaw in it not much red or anyone else can do to stop you). Don't ask other folks to do the work for you. [ It is even less work if just don't copy dancers don't care about. ]

There is exceedingly small utility in reinventing the wheel. Nor does it put a collaborative light on RB where there is advocation of diminishing the economic model RB using to support the free/open resources provided here. Never mind, the google account snoopy aspects to they collaborative vehicle proposed.

At the core a system for recording reviews already exists. Most of the fluff in this proposal just masks that.

If folks want to propose their own new review site, contact each other and knock yourself out. However, to use RB's resources to kick RB in the shins is low, IMHO. It is also a behaviour that is extremely likely to repeat itself later.

If folks want to keep summary/notes/data on their own research then again go ahead not youself out. Google docs is a vaible remote repository if need to creep and keep the data off your personal computer. The multi-user access features are relatively moot though in that context.

P.S. I don't drop as many reviews in RB because the predominate vocal attitude around here seems to be to screw over the review system. I thinks RB's model is fair but appears at least in this forum that the dominate attitude is to subjugate it. Not particularly enamoured with contributing just to be ripped off. One reason I waited a bit to respond was to see if was the still the dominating attitude. Appears to be the case.

You can do these things on the RB reviews section, but if I'm not mistaken, you need a VIP membership (which I don't have). And do you really want to sit there and crunch numbers to get an average? That said, any other feedback is appreciated.

Straight cash homey.

Also, how wide can this thing get? In other words, won't it be limited to a handful of raters?

Edit: 8.5 for the body? I hope you don't have a cold shoulder coming your way LOL.

Excel has 256 columns to a spreadsheet - the "intro" columns take up 5 and each person rating uses 5 - so 50 people could rate per sheet and Tiger could probably add worksheets if it filled up.

I would recommend using "freeze pane", Tiger, so that it's easier to keep track of what feature is being rated.

Thanks for the suggestions, Panther. I couldn't think of a way to get around massive horizontal scrolling without making a funny-looking table. Also, I wasn't sure if I wanted to do banded rows or color-coded by person (i.e. my section is yellow, someone else is blue, etc.)

Now I expect to see numbers from some of yous.

Straight cash homey.

I can't assign numbers - ever since the movie "10" came out and I remember being horrified at going around listening to young women going on about "I think of myself as an 8" or whatever, I've been kind of allergic to assigning numbers to women.

Rating LD's A to F - yeah
Commenting on who turns me on - yeah

Rating women's body parts 1-10 - can't do it.

OK, some of the other yous not named PP22 then. Pretty please?

Straight cash homey.