RedBook
EscortsPremier Adult Entertainment Community HOME | ADS | FORUM myredbok
Subject: "Vagina politics" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
printerPrinter Friendly view    
Conferences > Special Interest > Community Hall > Topic #49740
Reading Topic #49740

pique_us pique_us rating
Charter Member
3314 posts, 27 feedbacks, 52 points
22-Feb-12, 10:12 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to pique_us Click to add this user to your buddy list  
"Vagina politics"
 
   Why are Republicans so fixated on regulating vaginas? They are so dead-certain that all forms of "government" (except bombing people in other countries)are evil, yet they want to practice that very evil against women and their reproductive organs. Why?

The question Dowd poses below: "Why is it that Republicans don’t want government involved when it comes to the economy (opposing the auto bailouts) but do want government involved when it comes to telling people how to live their lives?" ... is not one I expect any of the GOP candidates to answer.

The New York Times
February 21, 2012

Rick’s Religious Fanaticism

By MAUREEN DOWD
WASHINGTON

Rick Santorum has been called a latter-day Savonarola.

That’s far too grand. He’s more like a small-town mullah.

“Satan has his sights on the United States of America,” the conservative presidential candidate warned in 2008. “Satan is attacking the great institutions of America, using those great vices of pride, vanity and sensuality as the root to attack all of the strong plants that has so deeply rooted in the American tradition.”

When, in heaven’s name, did sensuality become a vice? Next he’ll be banning Barry White.

Santorum is not merely engaged in a culture war, but “a spiritual war,” as he called it four years ago. “The Father of Lies has his sights on what you would think the Father of Lies would have his sights on: a good, decent, powerful, influential country — the United States of America,” he told students at Ave Maria University in Florida. He added that mainline Protestantism in this country “is in shambles. It is gone from the world of Christianity as I see it.”

Satan strikes, a Catholic exorcist told me, when there are “soul wounds.” Santorum, who is considered “too Catholic” even by my über-Catholic brothers, clearly believes that America’s soul wounds include men and women having sex for reasons other than procreation, people involved in same-sex relationships, women using contraception or having prenatal testing, environmentalists who elevate “the Earth above man,” women working outside the home, “anachronistic” public schools, Mormonism (which he said is considered “a dangerous cult” by some Christians), and President Obama (whom he obliquely and oddly compared to Hitler and accused of having “some phony theology”).

Santorum didn’t go as far as evangelist Franklin Graham, who heinously doubted the president’s Christianity on “Morning Joe.”

Mullah Rick, who has turned prayer into a career move, told ABC News’s Jake Tapper that he disagreed with the 1965 Supreme Court decision striking down a ban on contraception. And, in October, he insisted that contraception is “not O.K. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”

Senator Sanitarium, as he was once dubbed on “The Sopranos,” sometimes tries to temper his retrogressive sermons so as not to drive away independent and Republican women who like to work, see their kids taught by professionals and wear Victoria’s Secret.

He told The Washington Post on Friday that, while he doesn’t want to fund contraception through Planned Parenthood, he wouldn’t ban it: “The idea that I’m coming after your birth control is absurd. I was making a statement about my moral beliefs, but I won’t impose them on anyone else in this case.”

That doesn’t comfort me much. I’ve spent a career watching candidates deny they would do things that they went on to do as president, and watching presidents let their personal beliefs, desires and insecurities shape policy decisions.

Mullah Rick is casting doubt on issues of women’s health and safety that were settled a long time ago. We’re supposed to believe that if he got more power he’d drop his crusade?

The Huffington Post reports that Santorum told Philadelphia Magazine in 1995 that he “was basically pro-choice all my life, until I ran for Congress.” Then, he said, he read the “scientific literature.”

He seems to have decided that electoral gold lies in the ruthless exploitation of social and cultural wedge issues. Unlike the Bushes, he has no middle man to pander to prejudices; he turns the knife himself.

Why is it that Republicans don’t want government involved when it comes to the economy (opposing the auto bailouts) but do want government involved when it comes to telling people how to live their lives?

In a party always misty for bygone times bristling with ugly inequities, Santorum is successful because he’s not ashamed to admit that he wants to take the country backward.

Virginia’s Republican governor, Bob McDonnell, touted as a vice presidential prospect, also wants to drag women back into a cave.

This week, public outrage forced the Virginia Legislature to pause on its way to passing a creepy bill forcing women seeking an abortion to undergo an ultrasound, which, for early procedures, would require a wand being inserted into the vagina — an invasion that anti-abortion groups hope would shame some women into changing their minds once they saw or heard about traits of the fetus.

Democratic Delegate Lionell Spruill hotly argued that the bill would force “legal rape.” “I cannot believe that you would disrespect women and mothers in such a way,” he chided colleagues. “This legislation is simply mean-spirited, and it is bullying, bullying women simply because you can.”

While the Democratic-controlled Maryland House of Delegates just passed a bill that would allow same-sex marriage, the Republican-controlled Virginia Legislature passed a bill allowing private adoption agencies to discriminate against gays who want to be parents.

The Potomac River dividing those states seems to be getting wider by the day

  Alert Top

 
Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

herdloose herdloose rating
Member since 26-Oct-03
3316 posts, 12 feedbacks, 21 points
22-Feb-12, 11:26 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to herdloose herdloose profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
1. "RE: Vagina politics"
In response to message #0
 
   I hope as republicans legislate chastity belts or other ways of abstinence, more and more women will start running for public office.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/21/jon-stewart-slams-congress-all-male-birth-control-panel_n_1290541.html


  Alert Top

Jacket1 Jacket1 rating
Charter Member
33121 posts, 49 feedbacks, 59 points
23-Feb-12, 10:25 PM (PST)
Jacket1 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "RE: Vagina politics"
In response to message #1
 
   I'm also for more women running for office. And board rooms and front-line combat. Long live competition. If nothing else, a fair fight pisses off the left.

  Alert Top

Hardballer Hardballer rating
Charter Member
13965 posts, 126 feedbacks, 232 points
22-Feb-12, 11:33 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Hardballer Hardballer profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Vagina politics"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON 22-Feb-12 AT 11:33 AM (PST)
 
I like this term, "vagina politics."

I want to run for Governor of West Vagina, and bring good vibrations to the capital.

I'm going to run on the penis-vagina unity ticket. We will come as one!!!

Who's up for it???



  Alert Top

pique_us pique_us rating
Charter Member
3314 posts, 27 feedbacks, 52 points
22-Feb-12, 11:49 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to pique_us Click to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: Vagina politics"
In response to message #2
 
   Very funny!

If you announced today -- even as a republican -- you would jump into tie with Romney and Santorum.

  Alert Top

culo
Member since 18-Oct-08
1589 posts
22-Feb-12, 11:40 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to culo culo profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "RE: Vagina politics"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON 22-Feb-12 AT 11:41 AM (PST)
 
This is part of the republican psyche. An official plank in the Texas Republican Party Platform is to pass a law outlawing sodomy. Sodomy, in this case, is defined as any anal-genital contact OR oral-genital contact. That's right folks. No more blow jobs. No mention of hetero or homo. So if you get caught getting a hummer, you would face jail time.

The right claims to want a smaller, less intrusive government. That is a lie. They have a different agenda of items they want to control. And your sex life is right near the top of that list.

In addition, boards like this will go the way of the dodo. Republicans and feminists make an odd coalition that favors the elimination of john boards, and all escort advertising.

culo is a culo

  Alert Top

SeekerOfPoon SeekerOfPoon rating
Member since 31-Jul-08
5780 posts, 26 feedbacks, 45 points
23-Feb-12, 05:56 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to SeekerOfPoon SeekerOfPoon profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: Vagina politics"
In response to message #3
 
   You can write the law without specifically mentioning homo or hetero versions of Sodomy, so as to at least preserve a pretense of Constitutionality, but when you enforce it, you can only go after queers, thus leaving hetero hummers out of it. That's what the forward thinking folks in Mississippi or Alabama or Texas would do.

  Alert Top

AnayaLove AnayaLove rating
Member since 23-Oct-07
1565 posts, 79 feedbacks, 154 points
22-Feb-12, 01:13 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to AnayaLove AnayaLove profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: Vagina politics"
In response to message #0
 

http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/User_files2/9wrymxg9e9d1q2tz.jpg

I put the "ass" in class.

  Alert Top

Slohan_1 Slohan_1 rating
Member since 19-Aug-08
442 posts, 5 feedbacks, 9 points
23-Feb-12, 01:29 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Slohan_1 Slohan_1 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: Vagina politics"
In response to message #0
 
One might ask the Liberals why is their view of America looks like a Nanny State?

Politicians Lie,Liberals Control, Republicans are Clueless... enough said

  Alert Top

Hardballer Hardballer rating
Charter Member
13965 posts, 126 feedbacks, 232 points
23-Feb-12, 03:50 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Hardballer Hardballer profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: Vagina politics"
In response to message #6
 
   We don't.

We see it as a government of the people (not of who has the most money.)

We see it as a manager of the commons that creates the biggest and widest pie of wealth, along with life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

Join us.

  Alert Top

Ceeman Ceeman rating
Member since 2-Jan-09
270 posts, 8 feedbacks, 13 points
23-Feb-12, 05:44 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Ceeman Ceeman profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: Vagina politics"
In response to message #6
 
Repugs are clueless. Randi Rhodes put it pretty realistically the other day when she said repugs are afraid of the puss. She wonders why they can't be like the rest of us and just be disappointed.Ceeman

  Alert Top

kallell kallell rating
Charter Member
11855 posts, 91 feedbacks, 164 points
23-Feb-12, 06:35 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to kallell kallell profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: Vagina politics"
In response to message #0
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3vsI1_YFUo

------
Truth, Justice and the American Way

  Alert Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

   reviews | join vip | metasearch | terms of use | privacy top | help | faq    ©2011 myRedBook S.A.