RedBook
EscortsPremier Adult Entertainment Community HOME | ADS | FORUM myredbok
Subject: "can someone be banned for constantly flaming a provider?" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
printerPrinter Friendly view     picviewPic view    
Conferences > Northern California > AAMP / Massage Parlor > Topic #43981
Reading Topic #43981

DownSouth213 DownSouth213 rating
Member since 2-Mar-09
444 posts, 4 feedbacks, 6 points
09-Jul-10, 07:50 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to DownSouth213 DownSouth213 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"can someone be banned for constantly flaming a provider?"
 

We've all seen the incessant flame wars between members of this board. We've seen members blocked from posting on the board as punishment and we've seen handles deleted.

One thing I haven't seen personally is a member getting banned, or having their handle deleted for excessively, compulsively, disrespectfully berating a provider.

Is there a double standard? Are RAs "fair game" for abusive stalking on the board.

Perhaps I just haven't been around long enough to see how it's handled. Thankfully in the 2 yrs since I've been reading these pages I haven't seen a member who has such a vendetta until recently.


cut & pasted from the guidelines.....

4. Flames, personal attacks, slurs, threats, hate, inappropriate content, posting of supposed real names or addresses are subject to removal.
Off topic posts, or threads that have run amuck are subject to removal or locking.

Do not post private inboxes or email without permission from the sender. Keep your interactions private.

5. This is NOT a free speech board. Posts may be deleted or locked at the sole discretion of moderators and administrators. If you are frustrated by this policy, we also have a board with much free-er speech (NOT free there either): the Underground forum at .

While we do believe in the principle of free speech, we do not believe it is our obligation to fund the bandwidth for the world's opinions.

Two roads diverged and I chose the road down south

  Alert Top

 
Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Astroglide
Member since 13-Jul-04
7174 posts
09-Jul-10, 08:12 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Astroglide Astroglide profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: can someone be banned for constantly flaming a provider?"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON 09-Jul-10 AT 08:20 PM (PST)
 
Don't be surprised if this thread is relocated, as it's not exactly on-topic for this Massage Forum. But you do raise an excellent point of how our discussions of RAs are to be focused.

First of all, we are here to discuss RAs and not other RBers. Guideline #4 presumably refers to RBers in the forum, and not Providers.

Secondly, who is to judge what constitutes "excessively, compulsively, disrespectfully berating a provider" ? The member may simply be passionate about an adverse experience with that RA. What one calls "berating" may in fact be an honest and accurate appraisal. Opposing views are welcome to join in and give their different experience. We all can use the ALERT link if the post doesn't conform to forum guidelines or if there are extenuating circumstances for editing or deletion.

Thirdly, most handles are not deleted, but rather the handle is banned from posting in one or more specific forums. To detect that a handle is only banned, you'd have to search all of RB (VIP, private, and public) to find no further occurrences of that handle. There are reasons for handle deletions and reasons for forum banning. This place is quite tolerant and it seems to take repeated substantial violations before banning takes place. Handle deletions seem to occur most often when the handle was constituted to mock another handle or if an alias appears in the same thread in support of the poster's opinion.

  Alert Top

jsthavnfun jsthavnfun rating
Member since 12-Jul-08
4386 posts, 69 feedbacks, 125 points
09-Jul-10, 10:10 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to jsthavnfun jsthavnfun profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: can someone be banned for constantly flaming a provider?"
In response to message #1
 
>or if an alias appears in the same thread
>in support of the poster's opinion.

Gee if I had "a guess"?, that's a common occurance, on a daily basis in many threads! "One" talking with "one"self.

  Alert Top

Danger_Kotagashi
Member since 5-Dec-09
111 posts, Rate Danger_Kotagashi
09-Jul-10, 10:28 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Danger_Kotagashi Danger_Kotagashi profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: can someone be banned for constantly flaming a provider?"
In response to message #1
 
   LAST EDITED ON 09-Jul-10 AT 10:41 PM (PST)
 
Leave it to you to glide right up in there & sum up one person, using their 12 handles, to post 36 different rants in a week about the same RAs same body part, as he just simply felt passionate about his opinion of her. Single stupidest thing you've written, and really, that covers such mega volumes, and watch how fast this disappears even though its an opinion I too am very passionate about.
You are correct, we are all free to hit the alert button. But I can think of tons of pointless actions that won't amount to shit that I'm free to do. It doesn't mean I am
going to waste my time doing so, clown. This gonna be pulled faster than I can hit refrsh? I feel very passionate about it if that helps

  Alert Top

Astroglide
Member since 13-Jul-04
7174 posts
09-Jul-10, 10:50 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Astroglide Astroglide profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "Please explain fully why Post One is ''stupid''"
In response to message #8
 
   LAST EDITED ON 09-Jul-10 AT 10:56 PM (PST)
 
Glad you're passionate, but I was not referring to any single RBer, nor is there concurrence in your over-estimate of the alias handles and number of rants.

Things have been going nicely in this Forum. Flaming is way down, humor is up.

Post #1 was merely a statement about the valuable posted guidelines and how they seem to be applied.

Don't know why you felt the post was "stupid" but now is your chance to supply all the reasons Post #1 was "stupid" and/or inaccurate, and how you would modify it to your liking and approval.

Go right ahead please. Educate us fully.

  Alert Top

Danger_Kotagashi
Member since 5-Dec-09
111 posts, Rate Danger_Kotagashi
09-Jul-10, 11:03 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Danger_Kotagashi Danger_Kotagashi profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
12. "RE: Please explain fully why Post One is ''stupid''"
In response to message #11
 
   Tell you how to fix this simple annoyance? Sure can bub, it would be a pretty pitiful day if I couldn't step right up and set ya straight on a moments notice.

What needs to happen is simply open the ol' eyes, and take the half a second required to note that Koreannn, boobird, john2u etc. have yet to make one post with any meanging, of any significance. Find one worthwhile post from the group of them, that you think anybody would agree with you on, please. It's not in the eye of the beholder, they dont even offer up a premise of an effort. So, pull every post that is simply trouble making. Don't know what I'm talking about? Really? Not a clue?

As for your alert, and things are going really well around here.....inbox a few people. You know who they all are. They are still waiting. Alert must be out of service.

  Alert Top

Astroglide
Member since 13-Jul-04
7174 posts
09-Jul-10, 11:24 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Astroglide Astroglide profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
13. "Please explain fully why Post One is ''stupid'' (second request)"
In response to message #12
 
   Your reply is totally non-responsive and did not answer the question.

.

>What needs to happen is simply open the ol' eyes, and take
>the half a second required to note that Koreannn, boobird,
>john2u etc. have yet to make one post with any meanging, of
>any significance. Find one worthwhile post from the group of
>them, that you think anybody would agree with you on,
>please. It's not in the eye of the beholder, they dont even
>offer up a premise of an effort. So, pull every post that is
>simply trouble making. Don't know what I'm talking about?
>Really? Not a clue?

.

No. I don't agree with you. Each of us has something to contribute and each has his own style of posting. What is not valuable to you will be exciting and/or useful to another. A recent start post by "john2u" filled to auto-lock at post #25 so many found it interesting enough to reply.

.

>As for your alert, and things are going really well around
>here.....inbox a few people. You know who they all are. They
>are still waiting. Alert must be out of service.

.

I don't know who they are, nor do a "few people" make your argument or point of view. It's best to judge this Forum by the number of threads and posts per day, and the delta from 25 posts in each thread (meaning deletions). This place is super.

  Alert Top

Danger_Kotagashi
Member since 5-Dec-09
111 posts, Rate Danger_Kotagashi
09-Jul-10, 11:38 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Danger_Kotagashi Danger_Kotagashi profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
15. "RE: Please explain fully why Post One is ''stupid'' (second reque"
In response to message #14
 
   But I bet people are interested? you may not agree, but you gotta support it, right. They will be glued to it, yeah?

  Alert Top

DownSouth213 DownSouth213 rating
Member since 2-Mar-09
444 posts, 4 feedbacks, 6 points
09-Jul-10, 10:32 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to DownSouth213 DownSouth213 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: can someone be banned for constantly flaming a provider?"
In response to message #1
 
I wouldn't be surprised if the thread was deleted. To make it directly relevant to the forum I could mention the RAs name again but she's been disparaged enough.

Who is to judge what constitutes "excessively..."? I assume it's the members of this forum with their opinions and ultimately RED. I've read about 4 or 5 comments about the RA in multiple threads that aren't even about the specific RA. It reads to me like a stalker obsessed jerk and it's pathetic.

Two roads diverged and I chose the road down south

  Alert Top

jsthavnfun jsthavnfun rating
Member since 12-Jul-08
4386 posts, 69 feedbacks, 125 points
09-Jul-10, 10:41 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to jsthavnfun jsthavnfun profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: can someone be banned for constantly flaming a provider?"
In response to message #9
 
>I wouldn't be surprised if the thread was deleted. To make
>it directly relevant to the forum I could mention the RAs
>name again but she's been disparaged enough.
>

I as well as others know whom your refering to(RA), and the continued attacks on her and PO isn't going to hurt either one of them, unless of course some'one' starts to drop dimes "again"! After all the verbal threats of shutting them down could and may esculate..........

  Alert Top

rich_in_2001
Charter Member
1893 posts
09-Jul-10, 09:26 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to rich_in_2001 rich_in_2001 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "Be specific"
In response to message #0
 
   If you strongly believe a provider is receiving an untrue review, use the 'Alert' function in the review page:

'*Alert* support desk about this review'

Avoid the drama. Focus on what we johns are here at the first place: Getting Laid!

  Alert Top

drifter09 drifter09 rating
Member since 26-Nov-09
174 posts, 2 feedbacks, 1 points
09-Jul-10, 09:48 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to drifter09 drifter09 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: Be specific"
In response to message #4
 
   Right on bro.
Too much drama here these days.

Drift Away

  Alert Top

redball redball rating
Charter Member
5386 posts, 70 feedbacks, 137 points
09-Jul-10, 09:47 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to redball redball profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: can someone be banned for constantly flaming a provider?"
In response to message #0
 
   Would a conundrum emerge if an RA registered a handle and posted on the forum? Would primacy of status allow her to continue to be posted about (i.e. bashed) or would her "RB'er" status yield likewise precedence and offer #4(forum guidelines) protections?

After all, there is nothing inherently injunctive in the General or Forum Guidelines about an RA with an RB handle. I assume she would be allowed to fully participate pursuant to said guidelines.

Then, any post that verbally attacks or even provides identifying information beyond that published by her or her authorized representative is subject to removal and the handle, to deletion, per General Guidelines #4 and #10, respectively.



__________
Rompe Palle

  Alert Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

   reviews | join vip | metasearch | terms of use | privacy top | help | faq    ©2010 myRedBook S.A.