RedBook
EscortsPremier Adult Entertainment Community HOME | ADS | FORUM myredbok
Subject: "Boa or Angie (449-2904)" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
printerPrinter Friendly view     picviewPic view    
Conferences > Northern California > AAMP / Massage Parlor > Topic #44256
Reading Topic #44256

allisonli
Charter Member
37 posts
29-Jul-10, 03:10 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to allisonli allisonli profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
 
   Who is better in looks and service? I saw boa many times. Boa is eye candy and both have implants.

  Alert Top

 
Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

hkdigweed hkdigweed rating
Member since 18-Oct-09
302 posts, 7 feedbacks, 13 points
29-Jul-10, 07:09 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to hkdigweed hkdigweed profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #0
 
Angie:
http://www.myredbook.com/showpro.aspx?id=1473117

Boa:
http://www.myredbook.com/showpro.aspx?id=715524

Happy reading.

  Alert Top

berkeley1234 berkeley1234 rating
Member since 1-Nov-08
138 posts, 4 feedbacks, 8 points
29-Jul-10, 10:22 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to berkeley1234 berkeley1234 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #1
 
youre too nice digweed.

this thread and op deserve an instant lock and ban

  Alert Top

Astroglide
Member since 13-Jul-04
7402 posts
29-Jul-10, 11:05 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Astroglide Astroglide profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #2
 
  
>this thread and op deserve an instant lock and ban

Why do you think that ?

  Alert Top

CylentJ
Member since 9-Sep-02
69 posts
29-Jul-10, 09:21 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to CylentJ CylentJ profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #3
 
   AG,

Because it is just another shill post. Boring to me. Is it boring to you?

J.

  Alert Top

Astroglide
Member since 13-Jul-04
7402 posts
29-Jul-10, 09:32 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Astroglide Astroglide profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #5
 
   LAST EDITED ON 29-Jul-10 AT 09:38 PM (PST)
 
>AG,
>
>Because it is just another shill post. Boring to me. Is it
>boring to you?
>
>J.

Yes, and your complaint has merit:

1. Both have many reviews and those reviews disclose Boa looks slightly better and the OP could have relied on those reviews

2. Looks are subjective and replies in this thread wouldn't be more valuable or useful than those reviews.

So this might be shilling and/or lack of RB expertise.

I'm not interested in seeing either of these two women, and that's what makes it "boring".

  Alert Top

swass swass rating
Charter Member
3903 posts, 20 feedbacks, 40 points
11-Aug-10, 05:53 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to swass swass profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
14. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #5
 
>AG,
>
>Because it is just another shill post. Boring to me. Is it
>boring to you?
>
>J.

I suppose it could be a shill post.. but I can tell you that you have to call early in the day to get an appointment with Angie/LV. Generally by 6:00 pm she's booked up so I doubt she needs any shilling.... (I note with some irony that my response sounds a bit like a shill post...) As for BOA.. I don't know how busy she is.

  Alert Top

bone69 bone69 rating
Member since 17-Nov-06
2304 posts, 29 feedbacks, 54 points
11-Aug-10, 07:52 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to bone69 bone69 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
17. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #5
 
   Why do you call the OP's question/post a shill post?

I doubt he is an insider and he is not POSING as a satisfied customer (fabricated review, embellished service description and other lies). He is just having a hard time choosing. Like it's his swan song in this hobby and he wants to make his last session a memorable one (probably not the case, but he is treating his $200 as such). Granted, there are others out there who may be better and there are a bunch of new ones arriving all the time.

The word "shill" is waaay overused and has strayed from it's classic definition. If you spot a post and have proof that it is from an insider or the info is fabricated or are lies, then by all means, call it a shill post and alert the masses. But anything else is merely passing on info, PO (personal opinion) or enthusiastically supporting your favorite RA (by talking about her). The continued MISUSE of the word "shill" inhibits discussion and/or sharing info.

All discussion and/or alerts are welcome. You may find your next ATF through someone's alert so don't stifle discussion.

  Alert Top

amp_nomad
Member since 8-May-03
3067 posts
29-Jul-10, 08:21 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to amp_nomad amp_nomad profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #0
 
flip a coin! roll the dice! spin that roulette wheel! say your prayer!


  Alert Top

surferdude surferdude rating
Charter Member
1032 posts, 12 feedbacks, 24 points
30-Jul-10, 05:19 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to surferdude surferdude profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #4
 
   If you already seen boa a few times, you already know what you're going to get, so go see angie and don't waste the cyberspace!

  Alert Top

Astroglide
Member since 13-Jul-04
7402 posts
30-Jul-10, 07:20 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Astroglide Astroglide profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #7
 
   >If you already seen boa a few times, you already know what
>you're going to get, so go see angie and don't waste the
>cyberspace!


Hot damn ! That was short and right to the point. Good going, SurferDude. (But you meant to reply to Post #0, not #4).

  Alert Top

Lefeu Lefeu rating
Member since 27-Nov-08
453 posts, 7 feedbacks, 14 points
30-Jul-10, 11:02 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Lefeu Lefeu profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #8
 
   LAST EDITED ON 30-Jul-10 AT 11:04 AM (PST)
 
> That was short and right to the point

Plus, what could be more logical? The man has seen Boa several times and he's debating whether to see Boa again or see Angie. I would think it should be obvious that the answer would be Angie. Well put, Surferdude!

  Alert Top

Soccerman6 Soccerman6 rating
Member since 11-Nov-07
154 posts, 6 feedbacks, 12 points
30-Jul-10, 11:25 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Soccerman6 Soccerman6 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #9
 
   Good point Lef, but we're talking the selection of RAs here not Pythagoras' theorem. Logic often takes a backseat to lust.

I agree though, this is a waste of space. Both girls are well-reviewed and seem to have her share of fans. OP, pull the trigger man and go see one or the other. Always thought Boa was a tad overrated IMHO BTW.

  Alert Top

allisonli
Charter Member
37 posts
30-Jul-10, 10:56 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to allisonli allisonli profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #10
 
   $200 is still a lot of money. Just want to maximize value. Although both RAs were reviewed extensively, I would like to seek opinions from brothers who saw both RA for direct comparison.

  Alert Top

DownSouth213 DownSouth213 rating
Member since 2-Mar-09
574 posts, 10 feedbacks, 18 points
30-Jul-10, 11:05 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to DownSouth213 DownSouth213 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
12. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #11
 
what's your definition of maximizing value? If it's expanded service level there's no comparison - your pick should be Angie/LV. Is that not obvious? If your definition of maximizing value is some other metric then how can we help you without knowing?


Two roads diverged and I chose the road down south

  Alert Top

bone69 bone69 rating
Member since 17-Nov-06
2304 posts, 29 feedbacks, 54 points
11-Aug-10, 07:28 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to bone69 bone69 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
16. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #11
 
   If $200 is considered a lot of money for this hobby, you should probably find another, less expensive, hobby. Below $200, greater risk of B&S, MILFs, pics probably borrowed, pimped girls, etc. LA AAMPs usually ask for $250-$300. Escorts are often $400 and up with references required. And the escort price doesn't even guarantee a DDG provider.

$200 for an AAMP RA is very reasonable IMO. If you do your homework, can find a reasonably attractive RA, slim, good service. May even get BBBJ, CIM, rimming, coed shower.

A typical AMP would be $40-$60 base fee plus tip for extras. Approx $20-$40 for HJ, $40-$60 for BJ and $100-$120 for CFS. Not that much of a cost savings. And you have to do a little trial-n-error to find the places that offer extras and finding out how to ask for extras. MRAs are often older. Can usually find more attractive RAs at an AAMP.

So $200 seems to be a happy median.

  Alert Top

Astroglide
Member since 13-Jul-04
7402 posts
11-Aug-10, 08:33 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Astroglide Astroglide profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
20. "120-160 category generally superior to 200+ category"
In response to message #16
 
   >If $200 is considered a lot of money for this hobby, you
>should probably find another, less expensive, hobby. Below
>$200, greater risk of B&S, MILFs, pics probably borrowed,
>pimped girls, etc.

.

Semi-dismal presentation, and disagree to a great extent.

The 120-160 category women, even though mostly MILFs, have been substantially less disappointing than the 200 category women. The 200 category tend to be younger, have more cosmetic surgery, more fake boobs, use excessive make up, give poorer service, fewer GFEAs, and have a more limited menu.

Haven't met a truly "pimped" RA, unless you consider having a PO and owner being "pimped". B & S is mostly controlled by reading the reviews and getting excellent recon via all the forums, posts, and IBs.

And a nice bonus of the 120-160 range is that it permits more sessions, yielding that important part of this Hobby, variety.

  Alert Top

bone69 bone69 rating
Member since 17-Nov-06
2304 posts, 29 feedbacks, 54 points
11-Aug-10, 09:41 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to bone69 bone69 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
21. "RE: 120-160 category generally superior to 200+ category"
In response to message #20
 
   LAST EDITED ON 11-Aug-10 AT 09:46 PM (PST)
 
I prefer RAs I see to be young (or look young), slim, pretty and have natural boobs. Enhanced boobs are OK if nicely done. Some you can spot a mile away and others can barely be detected with a close inspection.

If the 120-160 category women are mostly MILFs, that's a deal breaker for me. Doesn't matter if they offer CIM, rimming, greek, MSOG. The best service in the world does not make up for the deficit in the looks department. Exception for a hot looking MILF. But haven't seen any of those on RB.

I choose the RAs I see mainly on looks. If I like her pics, she goes onto the inquire further list. If reviews/minis say she is older, a MILF and/or something other than slim, off the list she goes. My minimum requirement is to get CG, DATY, LK, BBBJ/CBJ and CFS. Don't care about how good her massage skills are. A bonus would be coed shower, preview BBBJ, BBBJ, CIM, rimming, DFK, MSOG. But if she only offered classic KGFE, that would be OK if she had the looks. So that would mean Boa would be on my list. If bonus menu items are offered, that pushes them higher up on my list. Preference for natural boobs also pushes them higher up on my list. I don't care if service is scripted or unscripted. Actually, I like girls with a script because I prefer they drive. I do not like to direct the action (do this, do that, a little lower, a little higher, etc). I find unscripted sessions to be awkward because she is always waiting for you to tell her what to do.

Problem with 120-160/hr RAs, most use fake pics so I have to rely on reviews/minis. If they are young, slim, pretty and give good service, they don't exist or people keep them for themselves. Have to wait too long for good, informative reviews/minis to show up (if they ever do). Often a reviewer would say something like "Her looks were OK and service was RBGFE". Which for me doesn't tell me anything I want to know before I make an appt and drive down. And I don't have the time and/or money to TOFTT all the 120-160 RAs I may be interested in based on the pics. So I go with the $200-$300 AAMPs with the higher probability of finding what I am looking for. If funds are short, I'll just have to work more.

By pimped, I meant girls with an actual pimp. Not girls affiliated with an org and use a PO for scheduling.

  Alert Top

Astroglide
Member since 13-Jul-04
7402 posts
11-Aug-10, 10:05 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Astroglide Astroglide profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
23. "RE: 120-160 category generally superior to 200+ category"
In response to message #21
 
   LAST EDITED ON 11-Aug-10 AT 10:06 PM (PST)
 
This is an impasse as there is no right or wrong and hobbyists have different priorities.

In contrast to you, many of us choose service, menu, passion, warmth, friendliness, and a high service/donation ratio.

Have never seen a pimped RA.

Fake pix are no big deal with good recon, and that recon is easy to extract. The 200 women have their faces blurred and the pix are Photoslopped anyway.

TOFFTing and seeing women early in their tours are both enjoyable, and with the proper approach and NBD, great times can be had.

Long live the 100-160 sector.

  Alert Top

bone69 bone69 rating
Member since 17-Nov-06
2304 posts, 29 feedbacks, 54 points
11-Aug-10, 11:11 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to bone69 bone69 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
24. "RE: 120-160 category generally superior to 200+ category"
In response to message #23
 
   It's difficult to be warm and passionate with someone I do not find attractive (I'm paying and they are selling so it doesn't matter what I look like or how old I am. I'm OK for an old guy).

Please share your experiences and give detailed descriptions. If more people would share their experiences with these women (before they leave) instead of keeping them to themselves, maybe I wouldn't be so pessimistic on the 120-160/hr category of providers and may try one on occasion.

We all have only so much time and money available. Hopefully, everyone finds what they are looking for so we can have a little fun and they (providers) make a lot of money.

For some reason, I find recon for $200 providers more plentiful and quicker than I do for the lower cost providers. If people would be more forthcoming with DETAILED information in a more timely manner, that would be better for everyone.

  Alert Top

avatar avatar rating
Member since 20-Jul-07
231 posts, 7 feedbacks, 14 points
11-Aug-10, 05:24 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to avatar avatar profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
13. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #0
 
   you gotta try angie.

  Alert Top

jsthavnfun jsthavnfun rating
Member since 12-Jul-08
4513 posts, 71 feedbacks, 129 points
11-Aug-10, 06:49 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to jsthavnfun jsthavnfun profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
15. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #0
 
Angie(449-2904) is not Angie/LV, or am I confused?

  Alert Top

swass swass rating
Charter Member
3903 posts, 20 feedbacks, 40 points
11-Aug-10, 08:20 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to swass swass profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
18. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #15
 
>Angie(449-2904) is not Angie/LV, or am I confused?

Ahh whoops..you are correct, she's this person:
http://classifieds.myredbook.com/classified.php?adid=164049

  Alert Top

Cifuinca
Member since 30-Oct-05
246 posts, Rate Cifuinca
11-Aug-10, 08:23 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Cifuinca Cifuinca profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
19. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #15
 
LAST EDITED ON 11-Aug-10 AT 08:29 PM (PST)
 
You're right. LV/Angie is 408-710-4114, not 449-2904.

I guess everyone have been talking about the wrong Angie.

However, there are more than one ad with this name and number:

http://classifieds.myredbook.com/classified.php?adid=164655

Not sure if they are the same person.

  Alert Top

chincha
Member since 23-Apr-10
130 posts, Rate chincha
11-Aug-10, 09:49 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to chincha chincha profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
22. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #19
 
   I was thinking of trying Angie too but her ads never appealed to me.

Boa is a known quantity, always a good time but I've seen her too many times already.

You always have to make that call, someone that you're familiar with or someone new. Going with the new person always has that bit of excitement and then there's that bit of disappointment if it's not what you expected. Going with someone you know, gives you some pretty nice comfort and session could go better or could be what it was last time.

For me, it depends on how I'm feeling that day.

  Alert Top

bestrearend bestrearend rating
Member since 7-Sep-05
781 posts, 3 feedbacks, 6 points
12-Aug-10, 11:05 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to bestrearend bestrearend profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
25. "RE: Boa or Angie (449-2904)"
In response to message #0
 
   after Boa I think you might be disappointed.

  Alert Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

   reviews | join vip | metasearch | terms of use | privacy top | help | faq    ©2010 myRedBook S.A.