I tend to find 'most' of the women attractive, just because I'm spending..."""TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS""" or more, isn't the end of the world if she(for some 'he')isn't perfect.

I'm tired of the whole whinney crap, and I'm guessing, of course, some of you guys(including myself?)woldn't make it past GND - - -! or less!!!

And while we're at it, just becaue we're spending """TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS"""(more or less), it doesn't give anyone the right? to degrade and speak of women like some of you 'men"???...lol.. do.

If """TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS"" is that precious to you, you might want to consider...........the stock market, invest your hard earned dollars there.

Underneath the whining it's probably more about a lack of funds, or they let a couple of negative attributes mentioned in the public forum dissuade them from seeing an otherwise excellent provider, or their expectations are way too high to begin with.

Regarding the grading/scoring itself. Hell my scores were "inflated" when I started out, given that I had little "frame of reference" . Though there are associated descriptions, as already mentioned, it's too subjective to hold much weight. Unless they're all under 7 or above 9. IMO, the wiggle room from 7-9 between clients is immense. Not to mention the reviews that are of questionable integrity. I'll use the scores to an extent, but I'm much more apt to be swayed thru inbox from handles I can trust.

I'm back with new pics and new contact number
by Jessica_Ka on Aug. 5 2010, 7:27 pm
City: San Jose

http://classifieds.myredbook.com/uploads/pix/l0/sn4jnlld563fvc5r.jpg
http://classifieds.myredbook.com/uploads/pix/l0/zmgcdvnw5q8zpkp5.jpg

If you are gonna be out $$ due to an inflated 9 or 10, we should be able to highlight the previous reviewer so that others can be aware. Sharing is caring, but YMMV.

Life is a box of expensive chocolates!

Put in each person's profile a sample of pics. Say 10 pics of girls most would say "could be a model", "attractive" and "girl next door". Like put up a picture of Christin, DDG Sara, ATF Jen, Ayaka, Kara, Yuka, Kitty, etc. Base rating purely on the pictures. I'm sure there would be a wide range of ratings. Like if you like bubble butts, you would rate those girls higher than if you preferred flat asian butts.

And also throw in a few BBW pics to see how guys would rate those.

That's what I do, generally. Plus, I look at the services offered. For example, I prefer DFK but do not care much about rimming or Daty.

It would be very difficult to change the score inflation that has crept up in RB (or maybe has always been there?. I think we need to find ways to navigate around it and make it useful.

I usually send a PM to the reviewer and ask them how they would rate one of my own ATF.

If their response is close to mine, then I accept the subjectivity of their review to be relatively closer to my tastes.

So far it's done pretty well.

re: Phoebe, Boobird, you are truly the anti-shill, haha. But I'll agree w/ Chincha in the sense that phoebe really is close to the epitome of great service w/ a pretty awesome body. Yeah, her face isn't DDG, but I would still say that she would be a closer to GND in my own tastes (vs Chincha's notches below) - and gentlemen, may I remind you that GND isn't a bad thing at all! It's a balance of service vs looks as several polls have shown.

I think you can then take my statement at look at my reviews and then get a feel for if my tastes are close to yours.

http://www.myredbook.com/showpro.aspx?id=1228952

Apparently many others don't feel the same way. You mad about something?

Matter of fact I've been thinking of meeting her for sometime now, basing that on private feedback from various handles. But then again 'all' the reviews and 'shared' information could be....?

BTW, wanna see my new "slap chop"?

If you get the chance, show him the new, improved model...

http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/soapz/9323.html

__________
Rompe Palle

Life is a box of expensive chocolates!