She even exceeds Japanese Yoko**. LV is a tireless relentless DFKer and nymphomaniac, highly skilled, cheerful, compliant, multi-orgastic, squirted more than 12 twelves during our sessions, does gagless DT in any position you choose, has superb hygiene**** GFE+++++++ and she loves her work. No way a woman could fake so well. Her orgasms pass six of the eight component tests for non-faking. She'll swallow you completely and thank you for it.

Absolutely the best service with the best attitude and the best hygiene (oral and vaginal) and excellent menu. Each session gets better, not jaded, never fatigued. She treats you like you are her only customer.

If you think she's doing BBFS as so many RAs do, then protect yourself appropriately if you wish.

** Japanese Yoko stopped working tonight, and is headed for Europe.

**** watch out for the dilute ethanol she will pour on your trouser worm during the post-session co-ed shower. It might slightly burn.

You may become just that...

Ha ha. No way. She is the busiest and happiest Provider I've ever seen.

Then perhaps you can give us the exact number.

Ad is still up and probably B&S her name like they did last year.

"Yoko?" No my name is Kathy.

Then avoid her.

I have seen her three times. She doesn't squirt. She has bladder incontenance and will pee when having an O. Trust me. I damn near drowned when she was sitting on my face. Twice!!

LV/Angie DOES squirt.

You are only questioning from where did the squirting fluid originate. It only occurs when she is having an orgasm, or at least at the time her PCGs are contracting.

FEMALE SQUIRTING/EJACULATION: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_ejaculation

.

Absolutely not. LV douches with 70% isopropyl alcohol 10:1 with water after each John, no matter what Menu she elects. She's super-hygienic in every other way also.

>She's super-hygienic in every other way also.

Most guys would not equate "super-hygienic" with "creampie queen".

.

1. She told me about her practices and I personally inspected the solutions and devices
2. I witnessed her rituals with each and every one of our sessions
3. Multiple detailed written and verbal reports from many credible RBers

.

>Most guys would not equate "super-hygienic" with "creampie
>queen".

.

Have no idea how you know what "most guys" would state. Never said she does cream pies and never called her a Queen of anything... until now: She's the Hygiene Queen.

You are not correct. Irrespective of her chosen Menu items, GFE or non-GFE, she pays meticulous attention to every aspect of hygiene.

>How the fuck do you know what she does "after each John"?
>Did you install a hidden camera in her bathroom?
>
>>She's super-hygienic in every other way also.
>
>Most guys would not equate "super-hygienic" with "creampie
>queen".

definitely tasted like 70% isopropyl alcohol 10:1 with water! Yum!!

Two roads diverged and I chose the road down south

Why the difference? I am beginning to think that the risks are comparable. The only real difference is the orafice of contact.

PS - I am not advocating BBFS. I don't go for it personally.

http://www.sfaf.org/aids101/transmission.html

HIV is not transmitted by saliva. There is a great deal of evidence to support this fact. In a study of 79 men with AIDS, the virus could be found in the saliva of only one. This man had PCP, thrush, and other mouth and throat lesions. Even in this man, the level of virus found in his saliva was 10,000 times less than the level in his blood. To this study we can add the evidence of the countless numbers of people who have had saliva contact with people with AIDS or others who have been infected with HIV. This contact has occurred through kissing, sharing food, and many other means. They can find no evidence that these activities have transmitted the virus even a single time. Recent findings suggest that saliva contains an enzyme which kills HIV. Certainly there is a lot at work in the mouth combining to make it an inhospitable site for the virus: acids, enzymes, friction, dilution, air, and more.

"If it's paid, it's not true. It's fantasy."

I've tried to do my homework on this subject, and here's what I've found:

BBBJ/CIM is definitely considered much lower risk in HIV transmision than BBFS. The actual numbers vary from study to study. However HIV isn't transmitted readily in the saliva, and is not transmitted simply by mucosal membrane contact ( I.E. skin on your penis, skin in the mouth ). The highest chance from HIV transmission is if there's a cut on either the penis or inside the mouth of the RA. Even within just this category, it is much more likely for HIV transmission to go from male to female than female to male during BBBJ.

In BBFS, micro tears occur in the vagina and the penis which help HIV transmission. Also, the HIV virus is found more readily in vaginal/seminal fluids than in saliva.

Just the stuff I've found floating around the net

BBFS runs the gamut of risks to both parties, if one is infected. BBBJTCIM runs the risk mainly to the crazy RA, who if she has a cut in her mouth or micro-lesions, can easily contract it. Then, if she goes BBFS, she can infect every that sees her. It is more contagious for both parties in BBFS. Only one party in BBCJTCIM.

>>Why the difference? I am beginning to think that the risks
>>are comparable. The only real difference is the orafice of
>>contact.

Saliva has enzymes which can break down the HIV virus. Also, HIV is not known to be concentrated in saliva. DATY is more dangerous than BBBJ/BBBJTCIM.

>>PS - I am not advocating BBFS. I don't go for it personally.
>
>
>I've tried to do my homework on this subject, and here's
>what I've found:
>
>BBBJ/CIM is definitely considered much lower risk in HIV
>transmision than BBFS. The actual numbers vary from study to
>study. However HIV isn't transmitted readily in the saliva,
>and is not transmitted simply by mucosal membrane contact (
>I.E. skin on your penis, skin in the mouth ). The highest
>chance from HIV transmission is if there's a cut on either
>the penis or inside the mouth of the RA. Even within just
>this category, it is much more likely for HIV transmission
>to go from male to female than female to male during BBBJ.

True. Also, female to male in cunnilingus, or DATY in laymen's terms.

Fellatio is more dangerous, but not for the male, more so for the female, especially if she has cuts and he is making a deposit or has pre-cum.

>In BBFS, micro tears occur in the vagina and the penis which
>help HIV transmission. Also, the HIV virus is found more
>readily in vaginal/seminal fluids than in saliva.
>Just the stuff I've found floating around the net

Very enlightened and factual. You've been doing your homework!

BBFS is risky not knowing your partner, that's all i have to say on the matter. BBFS can also lead to unwanted pregnancies.

"If it's paid, it's not true. It's fantasy."