I did not get "very defensive" about the response to my TOFTT post, in fact, I did not get defensive at all--i was merely trying to explain that it was not my intent to promote a provider who was using fake pictures. In fact, it has never been my intent to "promote" any provider.

When I see someone new (especailly if she has no reviews) I post information about her. This is not done to brag, promote, or for any reason other that adding to the collective knowledge of the community. If the information I provide helps someone else make an informed (and ultimately good) decision, great. If not, no harm done.

I saw the girl in question anticipating that the pictures were not real. I talked to her on the phone (and she was very pleasant), she answered her phone when I called from nearby to give me easy to follow, accurate directions, and she was ready when I arrived. All of these factors were taken into account when she opened the door and I realized the pics were fake.

There have been a number of times when I have gotten to the door only to have it answered by someone different (and always worse) than the girl in the picutre. A good 80% percent of the time I just walk. (I am always surprised by how well the girls take it--"sorry, thats not you in the picture, I am gonna cancel" has never led to any kind of denial or yelling or drama of any kind.

Sometimes, the girl will be attractive enough that even though she is different from the pics, I will choose to stay. This was one of those times. She was cute, sexy little body, and for the quoted price, I really didn't have much to lose. So I stayed, obtained some informaiton about her, and posted it for all to see.

I was not trying to promote her, and in fact, pointed out that the pics were no accurate, so that others would be aware. But it seems (at least to me) a little silly, not to post the information I have about her simply because her pics are not accurate. I don't see how anything is gained by that course of action.

Red made a comment on this.“~If you want to split hairs, there is a difference between fake pics which are representative of the person (intent is privacy), versus fake pics which are totally misleading (intent is fraud). However for that determination you need to see them in person, or check the reviews for the reviewer's opinion of the pictures vs actual.”

See post #3
http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/DCForumID251/4217.html

>In a nutshell, even real pix in one ad can be misleading and
>can give a far worse representation than fakes in another
>ad. I take each ad on its own merits.

Its all about does the girl who opens the door look like the girl in the pictures.

Too much sex is still not enough