It's an incredible disappointment to see someone who's supposed to simply mod the forum make it his personal soapbox for taking others to task without a good cause.

All I did here was point out that the topic posted by the lady OP was as valid as any other, and there was no need to take issue with it.

I even provided an 'example':

http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/DCForumID21/38990.html#5

Then the dubiously named "Highstepper" apparently feeling threatened by having someone with more sense and reason than himself, flies in to add his "thoughts" and hijack the thread completely:

http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/DCForumID21/38990.html#11

What is with you needing to try and have a pissing contest with me on the rare occasions I choose to post here? Dude..you don't like me, I get it. I did you no harm, and my post Paige was on point. Go throw some darts at a Happy Jack picture to feel better if you need to...

He then chooses to go at it with the OP of the thread too. Again, he must feel threatened in some way....

Highstepper, you really had no reason to act that way. I'm not sure who you think you are, but you did nothing but diminish yourself here.

As a mod, your actions should be to enforce the rules, and keep threads on topic. You should have no role in hijacking a thread or behaving in a way that drives off participation.

If you want to question posters and hijack threads, resign your position and let someone that can do the job without lecturing from his/her soap box.

Once again another new lady not in the "in" clique tries to participate, and gets trashed simply for posting info. No wonder new ladies are scared to post in the Sac Lounge!

You did nothing but add to it.

Great job as a moderator..........

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

It's an incredible disappointment to see someone who's supposed to simply mod the forum make it his personal soapbox for taking others to task without a good cause.

All I did here was point out that the topic posted by the lady OP was as valid as any other, and there was no need to take issue with it.

I even provided an 'example':

http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/DCForumID21/38990.html#5

Then the dubiously named "Highstepper" apparently feeling threatened by having someone with more sense and reason than himself, flies in to add his "thoughts" and hijack the thread completely:

http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/DCForumID21/38990.html#11

What is with you needing to try and have a pissing contest with me on the rare occasions I choose to post here? Dude..you don't like me, I get it. I did you no harm, and my post Paige was on point. Go throw some darts at a Happy Jack picture to feel better if you need to...

He then chooses to go at it with the OP of the thread too. Again, he must feel threatened in some way....

Highstepper, you really had no reason to act that way. I'm not sure who you think you are, but you did nothing but diminish yourself here.

As a mod, your actions should be to enforce the rules, and keep threads on topic. You should have no role in hijacking a thread or behaving in a way that drives off participation.

If you want to question posters and hijack threads, resign your position and let someone that can do the job without lecturing from his/her soap box.

Once again another new lady not in the "in" clique tries to participate, and gets trashed simply for posting info. No wonder new ladies are scared to post in the Sac Lounge!

You did nothing but add to it.

Great job as a moderator..........

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

It's an incredible disappointment to see someone who's supposed to simply mod the forum make it his personal soapbox for taking others to task without a good cause.

All I did here was point out that the topic posted by the lady OP was as valid as any other, and there was no need to take issue with it.

I even provided an 'example':

http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/DCForumID21/38990.html#5

Then the dubiously named "Highstepper" apparently feeling threatened by having someone with more sense and reason than himself, flies in to add his "thoughts" and hijack the thread completely:

http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/DCForumID21/38990.html#11

What is with you needing to try and have a pissing contest with me on the rare occasions I choose to post here? Dude..you don't like me, I get it. I did you no harm, and my post Paige was on point. Go throw some darts at a Happy Jack picture to feel better if you need to...

He then chooses to go at it with the OP of the thread too. Again, he must feel threatened in some way....

Highstepper, you really had no reason to act that way. I'm not sure who you think you are, but you did nothing but diminish yourself here.

As a mod, your actions should be to enforce the rules, and keep threads on topic. You should have no role in hijacking a thread or behaving in a way that drives off participation.

If you want to question posters and hijack threads, resign your position and let someone that can do the job without lecturing from his/her soap box.

Once again another new lady not in the "in" clique tries to participate, and gets trashed simply for posting info. No wonder new ladies are scared to post in the Sac Lounge!

You did nothing but add to it.

Great job as a moderator..........

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

Apparently not true at all......

This thread is an example of your need to come in and correct people after your ascension to the moderator position.

http://forum.myredbook.com/cgi-bin/dcforum2/dcboard.pl?az=show_thread&om=36167&forum=DCForumID21

As everyone can clearly see, you even went as far as to correct me on how I spelled "Giselle".

As I showed, I used the proper spelling, and that's the one I know. There is no proper spelling as "Gisellee". I feel no obligation to misspell her name just because she does.

This post also helped to establish your pattern as a self-appointed hall monitor of thought and expression. Your chartered position as moderator has no calling for such activity.

Plus there is another patter of you playing "Ho Defender" with any lady I take an opposing view with or make any kind of comment to which you take issue with! Are you that desperate to be like by the ladies????

I'm not alone in being subjected to your "Highstepping" by any measure.

You tell a nice story, but within the archives there exists plenty of evidence to shatter your tale.

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

You're incorrectly limiting my statement to her.

There are other new ladies bats.....surely you must know that.

~And her motivation certainly can be called into question. She did more than simply post information; she impliedly looked down her nose at RBGFE providers,~

That's an interpretation you chose to make. It was not forced upon you. I did not see her as looking down on anyone. Do you have some insecurities she touched?

~even to the point of suggesting that Paige's 4-hour rate was too low for RBGFE! That was just bitchy.~

Paige's rate structure was misunderstood and questioned previously in the Sac Hobby forum in various negatives ways. Where were you to criticize those folks then?

http://forum.myredbook.com/cgi-bin/dcforum2/dcboard.pl?az=show_thread&om=12397&forum=DCForumID211

I appreciate your efforts to be Highstepper Jr., but my points still stands, and I can back it up!

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

I feel you do come across at times as being a bit condescending.

I usually agree with you but every once in awhile we do not see eye to eye. I have to say though you are an entertaining read.

I did not see her as looking down on anyone.

While she did not explicitly say anything to promulgate that judgment, I think one can reasonably infer that. It seems to me she was deliberately trying to be coy yet look at her comment about Paige's multi-hour rate on a per hour basis. If you look at all of her comments, it seems to me she is being judgmental towards those who choose to participate in RBGFE activities.

Furthermore, why post the exact same thing within minutes of each other in three different forums, particularly the Sac Lounge when she is not even a Sac based provider?

Finally, she is not quite as new as you might think, having another handle with a member since date of March 2009. Surely, she must already be aware of the differing viewpoints on this topic and the reasons those choose to participate in RBGFE activities. This topic has been discussed numerous times in various forums.

http://forum.myredbook.com/user/CJ_Thomas_1988

BTW, I am not dissing non-RBGFE providers. Some of my best experiences have been with non-RBGFE providers and one of my closest and most valuable friends is a non-RBGFE provider.

~Everything in moderation
including moderation

I feel you do come across at times as being a bit condescending.~

I'm okay with you feeling that way. None of you are my friends or "bros" so I don't really care.

You're all part of a clique or cadre that covers for each other and hangs out together.

I have no problem with that, but it's not right when those loyalties spill over in to these type of threads. I just call it as I see it, and always have. Luckily, enough people outside the circle see my point whether they post in support or not. They're kind enough to comment via inboxes or feedback to me.

Whether this lady is new or not, she was cut no slack. That speaks a lot about how "outsiders" are treated by the circle.

It's one of the reasons this forum has more issues than any other.

That's a fact, not an opinion.

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

"Hooked on Crack"

Tell us some more stories about your various loves from here, or your decisions to retire to devote yourself to them xxxx.

Those are pretty humorous. We all enjoy them every time it happens.

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

The OP should have just been deleted for spamming, that way, we wouldn't have to listen to you're nonsense....in trying to kiss ass of yet another newbie chick.

Your constant bitching reminds me of Pumpire.....you made your point, but you can't just leave it at that....you always have to add more....and have the last word.

By the way, my name is MOTHER FUCKER to you, and your MOM says hello!

"Hooked on Crack"

I read quickly, and am not stupid. You wouldn't understand...

~The OP should have just been deleted for spamming, that way, we wouldn't have to listen to you're nonsense....in trying to kiss ass of yet another newbie chick.~

Oh rigid, of all people you should know I don't kiss anyone's ass.

I don't hang out with the guys here, and unlike you, I'm not trying to hook up and date the ladies here.

~Your constant bitching reminds me of Pumpire.....you made your point, but you can't just leave it at that....you always have to add more....and have the last word.~

Well......

A) I'm much smarter could ever hope be.
B) I speak out on selective issues..I have no personal grievances like Pumpire
C) I enjoy having the last word, and others enjoy it with me.

~By the way, my name is MOTHER FUCKER to you, and your MOM says hello!~

Wow...well, we know you tried your best! LOL

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/User_files2/50t609e2d5i5fyeq.jpg

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

No, you're incorrectly broadening my statement to include others. She seems to be an excellent example of a "new" provider who isn't afraid to post here. Maybe she's unusual in that way. I can't know that, however, and neither can you.

>~And her motivation certainly can be called into question.
>She did more than simply post information; she impliedly
>looked down her nose at RBGFE providers,~
>
>That's an interpretation you chose to make. It was not
>forced upon you. I did not see her as looking down on
>anyone. Do you have some insecurities she touched?

I "chose" that interpretation because it seemed reasonably clear. You didn't see it the same way. The only other difference is that I haven't gratuitously questioned the psychology behind your interpretation.

>~even to the point of suggesting that Paige's 4-hour rate
>was too low for RBGFE! That was just bitchy.~
>
>Paige's rate structure was misunderstood and questioned
>previously in the Sac Hobby forum in various negatives ways.
>Where were you to criticize those folks then?

What does that have to do with this?

>I appreciate your efforts to be Highstepper Jr.

Was that really necessary?

The rest is your opinion, which has no more validity than mine, and you're entitled to it. You've always been fairly critical of my words and actions, and that's okay too. You find pleasure in trying to moderate my behavior, and I don't want to take that away from you!

I've learned to accept your views, but I don't agree with them.

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

None of them? Surely I have some views, perhaps as yet unexpressed in these forums, that you would agree with! Come on, Jack! Work with me!

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

Duck----in coming

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"

You can't have it your way ALL the time! Stop all your fussin' and pick a nice one to have some fun with!

http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/User_files2/jwk0ixd8byy87976.jpg

xoxox

Hoss

Jack

"If U were smarter, I'd have nothing 2 do"