Ok, let me see if I can do this without violating the trust of a private forum. Oh, and let me preface this with "this is still speculation as I haven't received confirmation on her identity."Judging from the pics and description, I believe she's a girl I've seen thru a private group. If indeed that's true, then the following holds:
~her pics are accurate. She's slim, lovely skin, young, blonde, bubbly, tight, toned, a dancer... all that good stuff.
~breasts are clearly augmented, and you may notice a slight "flatness" on the lower edge of one of them (you can see it in the pics). They're pretty firm, so you natural-lovers out there may not like it. She probably could have gone a bit (just a bit) smaller and softer.
~has an ever so slight lazy eye.
~she's very new and inexperienced... she only saw a few people in the private forum before leaving.
~does (or did) indeed provide RB-GFE service, though you'll have to lead.
~has a raspy.... no, wrong word... wispy voice (very light... I guess that's why they say "angelic" in the ad).
Personally, I think she's too "nice" and naive for this industry. I guess what I mean is, she's not a "tough" person, and I'd hate for the industry (and people in it) to take advantage of her. She has the kind of demeanor and personaltiy where I'm afraid she may get hurt or change the course of her life. Does that make sense?
If she became a little more wise and street-smart, she could be a long term (and excellent) provider.
So, in the end, if she's still providing RB-GFE (and hell, even if it's just GFE), then I say give it a shot. 3.5 is a bit steep for her experience; if she's RBGFE I'd say 3 is better for now. If she's offering less (GFE), then my opinion is 2.5 or 2.75 would be more appropriate.
Good luck guys!
Premier Adult Entertainment Community
Printer Friendly view
Pic view
, 22-Mar-10, 08:34 AM, (9)
