Depends on your POV. Some hobbyists (i.e. jonjuan) think that a provider exercising their constitutional rights is a violation of his own civil rights, and maybe even human rights!

I think that, rather than understanding that providers have a right to choose whom they wish to see, we should table it before the U.N. Maybe they could debate it for a few months and come up with a really strongly-worded resolution or something. Yeah....that'd show 'em!

-History never repeats itself but it often rhymes.

All the twisted arguments made in defense of or against “whites only” providers are not but speculations.

Let’s hear from the real people. Let them say why they do not see black clients. It is only then that we can say they are not racists. In the absence of their responses, refusal to offer ANY service to ANYONE because of his/her color is discrimination/racism-live with it. If you do the crime do the time, simple as that.

Only a black clients know the pain associated with getting turned away after all the hustles because of their color, or having to ask someone-by the way do you see blacks? I have no way of knowing exactly how it feels but it quite sickening.

dj209,
Dude, hobbying is illegal and no aspect of it is protected by the constitution or any law. It is like saying crack dealers have constitutional rights to sell to black clients or not to sell to them. You see why hobbyist hardly call teh cop when they get ROB by providers and why providers get tricked.

Kingtut, I agree. Provider please helps us understand why you do not see black clients. I mean you do tell your clients that you do "not date black" but after the facts.

Don't you think it is more humane to save them the time they waste to even call you?

Simplicity Is The Key Note To A Happy
Life.

Here's the link: Note- only ladies can participate in this-

http://www.mypinkbook.com/cgi-bin/dcforum2/dcboard.pl

Since this isn't an issue for me, personally, I may not have been the best person to create such a poll (my options may be just stupid. I don't know ) but I hope this helps shed some light on the subject.

xoxox
MB

http://www.mypinkbook.com/dcforum2/gtalk/7203.html

Too much sex is still not enough

I dont know if it was "ignorant" of me but I sure like the anonymous
poll idea better. Secondly, many ladies have alternate handles on
pinkbook so they can "raise their hands" more freely over there.

We will revisit it forever...over and over again.

Times change...people don't. Ignorance knows no bounds ....

These providers have a right to see whom ever they please. Period.

These same providers OWE us the courtesy of stating their preferences in advance (in their ad..or screening process..whatever)

Failure to do so is plain DISRESPECT and not to be tolerated (MHO..)

Any provider showing such disrespect should be outed and boycotted(again..MHO..) The only thing they understand is to hit them in the pocket book.

C ya same time..same station ..next week when we do this AGAIN!

justmeinvisalia
aka DOM
DirtyOMan

As ramfan, said earlier, no one is going to come forward to be chastised because they choose not to see blacks, even on pinkbook. It is a providers preference, whatever the reason.

I am Asian and if I started going to appointments only to have a lot of providers say, "Sorry, I don't see Asians," I would start asking providers if they had a problem with nationality before I actually went to the appointment. To all the black hobbyist out there; I know this is a hassle, but unless you want to continue to get turned away at the door, maybe you should make that a practice.

I know I don't see it 1/2 as much as you, but at times, when I'm on a date with a white girl, I will get the occasional disapproving look from a white couple. Prejudice runs deep, but I do believe society as a whole is getting better.

And while you make good points averagejoe, it really doesn't take any effort at all for me to speak proper English. I've been speaking it for almost forty years.