RedBook
EscortsPremier Adult Entertainment Community HOME | ADS | FORUM myredbok
Subject: "Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
printerPrinter Friendly view    
Conferences > Member Channels > House of Pain > Topic #7061
Reading Topic #7061

Lamentatio
Member since 24-Mar-10
346 posts
13-May-10, 02:03 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Lamentatio Lamentatio profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character"
 
   LAST EDITED ON 13-May-10 AT 02:06 AM (PST)
 
You present yourself as a man that is concerned about the dangers the girls here face, let's test that appearance. I got this inbox from mikhail_Bakunin-

"Now about your connection to Farrah, how close is it? I want her personal ID info. You have it of course, now will you share it?"

I've known this dildo for over ten years. He wants the info to harass her in her personal life, or to provide it to people that will harass her in her personal life though all she's done is be a troll on redbook. The reason why he targeted her is because he saw a group of people pissed at her, so he figures he can target her and use group sentiment as a smokescreen to hide the fact that it's a personality disorder motivating him. I have no problems with fucking with people online, but searching for personal info to invade a posters private life (especially the private life of one of the girls) because you didn't like their posts is way overboard. I'm sure you'll agree.

here's the test- you have this info, will you use it in a manner consistent with your stated concern over dangers the girls face (and get to the bottom of the matter to figure out whether I am giving you valid info or not) or will you disregard it because public sentiment currently will allow you to throw farrah to the wolves without damaging your reputation.


  Alert Top

 
Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

kallell kallell rating
Charter Member
8599 posts, 71 feedbacks, 125 points
13-May-10, 02:36 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to kallell kallell profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character"
In response to message #0
 
"though all she's done is be a troll on redbook."
I am sure you do know this statement is untrue. She has used personal info to invade posters private lifes.

The fact that she is not just a troll still does not give one the right to harass her in her personal life.

------
Truth, Justice and the American Way

  Alert Top

notmeithink
Member since 22-Feb-09
4820 posts
13-May-10, 10:16 AM (PST)
notmeithink profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character"
In response to message #0
 
   You think Pitt should be responsible to uncover and right all the bad behavior of everyone here on RB?

  Alert Top

Stella Stella rating
Member since 9-Oct-05
1827 posts, 81 feedbacks, 154 points
13-May-10, 01:54 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Stella Stella profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "RE: Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character"
In response to message #2
 
>You think Pitt should be responsible to uncover and right
>all the bad behavior of everyone here on RB?


But Red should ?

~Stella

  Alert Top

Mikhail_Bakunin Mikhail_Bakunin rating
Member since 23-Nov-09
4654 posts, 26 feedbacks, 48 points
13-May-10, 02:18 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Mikhail_Bakunin Mikhail_Bakunin profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character"
In response to message #3
 
  
Nope but the stuff that is a physical danger to others, yes.

  Alert Top

Stella Stella rating
Member since 9-Oct-05
1827 posts, 81 feedbacks, 154 points
13-May-10, 06:01 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Stella Stella profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character"
In response to message #4
 
> Nope but the stuff that is a physical danger to others,
>yes.


Unfortunately though, all anyone can really do is try and warn the community. I mean, I wish certain people would just go away too, especially if they are dangerous. But when people start pointing the finger at Red and getting all upset because he's not banning people, they need to think it through a bit. The undesirables will just come back with new handles, new IP's and it would almost be worse because then you don't know who is who anymore. See what I am saying ?

~Stella

  Alert Top

ClerkDante ClerkDante rating
Charter Member
5429 posts, 19 feedbacks, 32 points
13-May-10, 06:56 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to ClerkDante ClerkDante profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character"
In response to message #5
 
I think it's the inconsistencies people have a problem with more than anything. The "average" poster says one negative thing to a provider and they're instantly banned from 1/2 the forums on this board and then altogether the first time they say something controversial in another.

In contrast there is a small handful of providers (most if not all of whom pay for advertising) who've been attacking people for years, have repeatedly posted private information in public forums (this could be things as little as inboxes, or as big as photos, real names and phone numbers) and just in general stir up bile wherever they go, and for some unfathomable reason (though the paid advertising is likely why) they continue on as if nothing has ever happened. The Mods role in, clean up the mess like they're Mr Wolf from Pulp Fiction, the provider lays low for a couple of days, and then goes about her spamming, evil business as if it had never happened.

If everyone was treated the same, no matter how much one might disagree with the chosen way, I doubt there would be a fraction of the "what's Red going to do about this" backlash as their currently is.

Cagefighter, for example, is an obnoxious troll who stirs shit at every turn, but for the most part is ultimately harmless, but he gets banned 5-6 times a month. He's never done anything a fraction as offensive, and potentially harmful, as some of these girls who's actions go routinely overlooked. Nay, not only overlooked, but passively endorsed by the continued efforts to clean up after them, defend them and even on occassion support them as "adding value" to the forums.

...and that's, one to grow on.

  Alert Top

MongerAlmighty MongerAlmighty rating
Member since 22-Aug-07
2017 posts, 21 feedbacks, 30 points
13-May-10, 10:41 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to MongerAlmighty MongerAlmighty profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character"
In response to message #6
 
   Excellent insight Clerk. Your words seems to be a good summary of how RB has operated for years. The ultimate slap in the face is when the worst offenders get their own forums.

  Alert Top

Lamentatio
Member since 24-Mar-10
346 posts
14-May-10, 08:14 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Lamentatio Lamentatio profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
15. "RE: Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character"
In response to message #3
 
   "You think Pitt should be responsible to uncover and right
>all the bad behavior of everyone here on RB? "

I don't care about responsibility. I'm like the state of California, I just want to dump my toxic waste in Nevada.

  Alert Top

Pitt Pitt rating
Member since 3-Oct-02
2294 posts, 103 feedbacks, 177 points
13-May-10, 11:10 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Pitt Pitt profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character"
In response to message #0
 
You've known this dildo with a personality disorder for ten years and you think I should be worrying about my reputation? Why haven't you jerked his chain? Oh wait, you're a cowardly fuck and you turned the childish user ratings off in an effort to hide your inability to cope with people that fuck with you online.

I really don't give a fuck about public sentiment. The public can suck my fucking dick. You're a dipshit and if Mikhail_Bakunin is stepping over the line I'm thinking that Farrah would share that with me.

The Mighty Magical Wizard of Pussy

  Alert Top

Lamentatio
Member since 24-Mar-10
346 posts
14-May-10, 01:14 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Lamentatio Lamentatio profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "nice work pitt"
In response to message #8
 
   LAST EDITED ON 14-May-10 AT 01:28 AM (PST)
 
"You've known this dildo with a personality disorder for ten years and you think I should be worrying about my reputation?"

Interesting response there pitt. you responded to a statement that you didn't have to worry about your reputation as if it were in fact stating the exact opposite. You did that because you saw the word "reputation" and lapsed into a reflexive fear of your facade slipping. That was so primary in your concerns that it was the first point you wanted to address, though it was at the end of my post and wasn't even directly related to the topic at hand. From the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks.


"The public can suck my fucking dick. "

If the public wants to catch gonorrhea from a douchebag

"You're a dipshit and if Mikhail_Bakunin is stepping over the line I'm thinking that Farrah would share that with me. "

Great, then I leave the matter in your hands. Have fun.

  Alert Top

wizeguy wizeguy rating
Member since 3-May-04
5581 posts, 112 feedbacks, 216 points
14-May-10, 10:17 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to wizeguy wizeguy profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: nice work pitt"
In response to message #9
 
   Am I missing something here?

  Alert Top

alphawolf1 alphawolf1 rating
Member since 6-Jan-05
1820 posts, 10 feedbacks, 18 points
14-May-10, 10:39 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to alphawolf1 alphawolf1 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "RE: nice work pitt"
In response to message #10
 
>Am I missing something here?


I sure know I am.

  Alert Top

JewelsLavender JewelsLavender rating
Member since 19-Aug-08
2297 posts, 110 feedbacks, 217 points
14-May-10, 06:05 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to JewelsLavender JewelsLavender profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
13. "RE: nice work pitt"
In response to message #10
 
I am a little confused as well. I think what he is implying is that
Pitt and Redbook are the same person!
I never saw that coming

-Your Wonder Woman-

  Alert Top

ronmemexico ronmemexico rating
Member since 10-Jun-05
1531 posts, 60 feedbacks, 118 points
14-May-10, 07:25 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to ronmemexico ronmemexico profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
14. "RE: nice work pitt"
In response to message #13
 
LAST EDITED ON 14-May-10 AT 07:30 PM (PST)
 
It's all so clear now!!! Pitt is "Red" and Mikhail_Bakunin is "book". When combined they equal "redbook". Now, who is "SF". My guess is "Psychco Farrah" but my logic might be flawed because the "P" in "SF" would need to be silent and exist in the first place.

"The love you take is equal to the love you make."
Paul McCartney

  Alert Top

corvetteron corvetteron rating
Member since 18-May-06
7691 posts, 100 feedbacks, 177 points
15-May-10, 08:57 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to corvetteron corvetteron profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
16. "RE: nice work pitt"
In response to message #9
 
   Do you have a twin Brother who's fat, stupid and looks like a guy in drag?

  Alert Top

PhallasLengthy
Member since 18-Jan-10
990 posts
15-May-10, 09:02 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to PhallasLengthy PhallasLengthy profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
17. "RE: nice work pitt"
In response to message #16
 
>Do you have a twin Brother who's fat, stupid and looks like
>a guy in drag?

Why, are you looking for your long-lost twin?

  Alert Top

Mikhail_Bakunin Mikhail_Bakunin rating
Member since 23-Nov-09
4654 posts, 26 feedbacks, 48 points
14-May-10, 04:36 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Mikhail_Bakunin Mikhail_Bakunin profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
12. "RE: Hey Pitt, here's a little test of your character"
In response to message #0
 
  
"...I've known this dildo for over ten years...." Actually we have never met and you show little understanding of who I am or what I choose to do with my time, so your first statement of supposed fact is complete bullshit and indicates the relative value of the rest of your post. You're losin' your edge in your old age.

  Alert Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

   reviews | join vip | metasearch | terms of use | privacy top | help | faq    ©2011 myRedBook S.A.