RedBook
EscortsPremier Adult Entertainment Community HOME | ADS | FORUM myredbok
Subject: "Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal behavio" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
printerPrinter Friendly view    
Conferences > Special Interest > SF Bay Area Lounge > Topic #31952
Reading Topic #31952

The_BushMaster
Member since 1-Sep-10
2 posts
01-Sep-10, 04:17 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to The_BushMaster The_BushMaster profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal behavio"
 
   Someone with a name very similar to mine appeared on Michael Krasny's Forum radio show yesterday to discuss CL's efforts to reduce the criminal use of the site and to answer call-in questions.

The speaker caught holy hell from some almost hysterical lesbian twit that kept demanding that we (er...I mean, "that CL") eliminate entirely the adult services section, calling it nothing more than a thinly disguised front for prostitution and intimating that the site facilitated the trafficking of women for purposes of exploitation.

I want to know why in God's name CL seems to have become the lightning rod for every bogus politician and lesbian twit crusader? RB is just so much more obvious of a target. Why have they not gone after you folks in such a dedicated and publicized fashion? Could it be that your leader - the infamous and anonymous Redbook - is actually a very well connected member of the ruling class and is, for this reason, protected by his own kind? Or is it that RB could easily move their servers off-shore and therefore don't present such an easy target as CL?

None of us here want to see women trafficked or minors misused, but do these self-righteous fools believe for even a single instant that eliminating CL's adult services section would have any effect at all on those issues?

In a somewhat craven move, the big cheeses at CL have decided to put more effort into actually screening all those, ahem, massage and legal escort ads. The ladies will have to be even more circumspect than before in describing what their services are and in picturing themselves. To cut to the chase, it's been suggested that in order to be absolutely certain that no one is offended, women should pose in a traditional Burkka outfit (Moslem head-to-toe covering clothing) or simply insert in the place of their actual photo a pic of a small fluffy creature (NOT a kitty, please).

Also, do not use any word that has even a remote sexual reference. For example, do not describe anything as "happy" or use the word "relax" because these are easily seen to be code for illicit sex acts. Similarly, do not mention that you're Greek (or anything at all about island travel, for that matter) or that you want to do anything like a cowgirl. In this way the hypocritical prudes behind these attacks may be mollified for a while longer.

Inevitably, though, more direct action may need to be taken - and that's where you folks come in! At least 50% of the men who are waging war against CL (and prolly some of the women too) have been paying for "enhanced services" on the down-low for some time now. So, it'd be just peachy if all providers kept a look out for these folks and helped to out them so that we can all just get back to normal again. I'm not going to directly suggest that these individuals be set up by offering them reduced rates or especially enticing services (btw, many of them just can't resist being sissified and humiliated). And I certainly wouldn't want anyone to actually film them in the act -God forbid - and then threaten to go public with the pics...that would be truly horrible!


"I aim to tweeze"

  Alert Top

 
Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

macimay macimay rating
Charter Member
2021 posts, 31 feedbacks, 49 points
01-Sep-10, 07:06 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to macimay macimay profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal beh"
In response to message #0
 
LAST EDITED ON 01-Sep-10 AT 07:09 PM (PST)
 
>I want to know why in God's name CL seems to have become the
>lightning rod for every bogus politician and lesbian twit
>crusader? nded, women should

>Inevitably, though, more direct action may need to be taken
>- and that's where you folks come in! .....And I certainly wouldn't want
>anyone to actually film them in the act ....
>

I'll tell you why CL is the target, it's because they flinched. They personally responded to the bullshit and they never ever should have done that. CL made changes and they should have never ever done that because making those changes hasn't resulted in anything besides more demands for more change....it'll never stop. Never.

And I have long been an advocate of filming certain people, all those a Eliott Spitzers are out there just waiting to be exposed and defrocked, fired, discriminated against...but you know, firing spitzer didn't stop in the gloria stienums' from getting continuing to pimp the poverty...and those are the women who need to be discredited more than the men. And the only way to do that is to cut us loose on those women. They need to made to face those of us who've been make suffered the brunt of their flawed false and misleading policies.

close your eyes and pretend I'm a girl.

  Alert Top

Lolitatherealdeal
Member since 26-Jul-10
20 posts
01-Sep-10, 08:33 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Lolitatherealdeal Lolitatherealdeal profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal beh"
In response to message #1
 
   <object width="335" height="85"><param name="movie" value="http://www.kqed.org/assets/flash/kqedplayer.swf"></param><param name="flashvars" value="file=http://www.kqed.org/radio/archives/R201008310900.xml"></param><embed src="http://www.kqed.org/assets/flash/kqedplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="335" height="85" flashvars="file=http://www.kqed.org/radio/archives/R201008310900.xml"></embed></object>


http://www.kqed.org/a/forum/R201008310900


http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/User_files2/49t6wv6ysz64f8z5.jpg

Maybe I should pose as an undercover victims to see what exactly they say to me. I wonder if I'll have to sleep with these women in order to get any help, that would fun to get on tape...right? Who'd pay me to do that? I'll tell them I'm seventeen...

  Alert Top

Dellsnorto Dellsnorto rating
Member since 8-Nov-08
1286 posts, 33 feedbacks, 58 points
02-Sep-10, 08:52 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Dellsnorto Dellsnorto profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "RE: Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal beh"
In response to message #1
 
   "I'll tell you why CL is the target, it's because they flinched. They personally responded to the bullshit and they never ever should have done that. CL made changes and they should have never ever done that because making those changes hasn't resulted in anything besides more demands for more change....it'll never stop. Never."

There's no doubt, it's definitely a slippery slope and once you've put one foot on it by responding to their demands you're very likely to slide all the way to the bottom, which in this case would be the elimination of the adult services and adult gigs sections.


"And I have long been an advocate of filming certain people, all those a Eliott Spitzers are out there just waiting to be exposed and defrocked, fired, discriminated against...but you know, firing spitzer didn't stop in the gloria stienums' from getting continuing to pimp the poverty...and those are the women who need to be discredited more than the men. And the only way to do that is to cut us loose on those women. They need to made to face those of us who've been make suffered the brunt of their flawed false and misleading policies."

I'm telling you, filming is the way to go. Catch a couple of these holier-than-thou types with their trousers around their ankles gettin' head from some street ho and then let's see how vocal they remain. As with all those fundamental preachers who so self-righteously inveighed against the sins of the flesh, the ones that are the loudest are the ones most likely engaging in the most deviant sex acts. Just think if a few of those Roman Catholic Choir boys had had a cell phone cam when Father Pedo Perv was plying them with sacramental wine and sucking their tiny pre-pubescent dicks! That shit would have come to an end in the U.S. far sooner than it actually has. I say, "Film them all and let God sort them out!"

  Alert Top

macimay macimay rating
Charter Member
2021 posts, 31 feedbacks, 49 points
02-Sep-10, 01:50 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to macimay macimay profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal beh"
In response to message #3
 
So which are the best camera's to get for this kind of endeavor? One's that record or one's the upload directly to websites?


close your eyes and pretend I'm a girl.

  Alert Top

zoezane zoezane rating
Member since 10-Jun-04
2345 posts, 23 feedbacks, 43 points
03-Sep-10, 08:15 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to zoezane zoezane profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal beh"
In response to message #1
 
Why CL is under the gun and not RB. An escort was murdered off of CL. CL did not monitor the ads way back and you saw kiddy porn, family incest, and pimps pusing their hos. Actually their hos would call us girls up and slam us for posting. It was so bad that they got the shaft from the DA and FBI. I did not see RB with any of those problems. CL thought it was our job to monotor the ads and this is what CL gets for putting their heads in the sand. That is why CL is monitored now and FOREVER. All my girlfriends and I watched the whole thing go down. RB has monitored its site and that is why RB did not get the crap like CL.
zoe zane

CL pic: a bunch of dumb asses on the job


http://forum.myredbook.com/dcforum2/User_files2/w8ty2wuqi2w7v6rq.jpg


Little did they know who they affected the whole underground for providers/escorts.

Now you can post the word escort in CL ads, it is so fucked up. Many ads have massage now. It bounces back and forth from this word to that word. Now you can get busted for light GFE.

  Alert Top

massageman2020 massageman2020 rating
Member since 21-Dec-02
8436 posts, 60 feedbacks, 104 points
02-Sep-10, 02:14 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to massageman2020 massageman2020 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal beh"
In response to message #0
 
CL is a handy target for several reasons:
First and foremost, they represent an existential threat to print news media! Classified ads are an important part of the newspapers' revenue, and CL is destroying classified ad revenue. All the news media is a bit symbiotic in that they keep people thinking about the news, and they'll support each other.
Second, they are all over the country, including markets that are in the Bible belt. Some communities are more sensitive to adult content than others. Those that are most sensitive make the most noise, and the media is always looking for a negative story about CL.

It has nothing to do with "flinching". CL would be on the same collision course regardless of whether they appeased their attackers or not.

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

  Alert Top

Asubtlesenior
Member since 15-Jan-10
137 posts, Rate Asubtlesenior
03-Sep-10, 09:28 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Asubtlesenior Asubtlesenior profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal beh"
In response to message #0
 
   I can't find the article/reference about the high school girl's club (I think in Cleveland) that made girls post on CL. Once they saw a john they were in the club. Obviously LE frowns on this behavior and felt that if CL wasn't so easy to use the abuse of these high school girls wouldn't have happened. Yeah right.

  Alert Top

sydnee4u67 sydnee4u67 rating
Member since 31-Jul-09
206 posts, 3 feedbacks, 5 points
03-Sep-10, 11:24 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to sydnee4u67 sydnee4u67 profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal beh"
In response to message #7
 
"The speaker caught holy hell from some almost hysterical lesbian twit that kept demanding that we (er...I mean, "that CL") eliminate entirely the adult services section, calling it nothing more than a thinly disguised front for prostitution and intimating that the site facilitated the trafficking of women for purposes of exploitation."

This Norma Ramos and her group are delusional. They are making generalizations about prostitution that are ridiculous: She said that prostitution is a form of oppression, that all prostitutes are a result of abusive circumstances, poverty, drug addiction, sexual abuse, or forced labor. I and the women I know in this business do not possess nor have ever experienced any of these. Not they don't occur in the population, but it is not the norm in my circle.

Norma and her group do not see the difference between exploitation of women, and self empowerment that this choice gives us. If they want to be effective in stopping oppression and child exploitation then by all means go for it, but leave me and the droves of women and men who enjoy this lifestyle in a safe manner alone!

~syd

  Alert Top

Dellsnorto Dellsnorto rating
Member since 8-Nov-08
1286 posts, 33 feedbacks, 58 points
03-Sep-10, 12:03 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Dellsnorto Dellsnorto profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal beh"
In response to message #8
 
   "Norma and her group do not see the difference between exploitation of women, and self empowerment that this choice gives us. If they want to be effective in stopping oppression and child exploitation then by all means go for it, but leave me and the droves of women and men who enjoy this lifestyle in a safe manner alone!"

Amen, sister! Several times in that hour-long discussion, Ms. Ramos cited what seemed to me to be bogus, made-up statistics to support her claims and conclusions. After an articulate provider called in to express an opinion very similar to yours, Ms. Ramos stated that only 1% of the women engaged in the P4P biz were empowered, independent women working in the biz of their own accord. She dodged the question of where she was getting that stat and dodged others as well.

For folks like her, prostitution is by definition degrading and exploitative of women, so whatever evidence there is in reality to counter that fantasy just doesn't alter her perception or views.

Just as with the issue of illicit drugs, it's the demand that fuels the biz and no amount of police enforcement or penalties are going to substantially reduce that demand. The only approach worth considering in both cases is one of harm mitigation. In the case of drugs, it is clear that certain intoxicants/euphorics (e.g., inhalants, crank, alcohol) have much more serious health and impairment consequences than others, such as cannabis. In the case of P4P, of course everyone with any conscience and basic human caring does not want women to be trafficked and exploited for any reason, and minors should never be allowed to be exploited. Women who choose to make a living by selling their bodies, but who do so only because of economic hardship, should be given assistance, education, child care, etc. instead of being targeted for arrest and exploitation by the criminal "justice" system.

The only part that Ms. Ramos had right was her support for the Swedish model, which goes after pimps and traffickers instead of the girls. Start there in the U.S. and you've got my attention. Otherwise, it's just a bunch of BS at volume.

  Alert Top

macimay macimay rating
Charter Member
2021 posts, 31 feedbacks, 49 points
03-Sep-10, 12:26 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to macimay macimay profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal beh"
In response to message #9
 
LAST EDITED ON 03-Sep-10 AT 12:36 PM (PST)
 
Prostitution haters like those people use false and misleading information as a matter of course to justify their domination over our voices.
They're just interested in maintaining their control over us by keeping everything criminal so they can profit off of it. These faux human rights groups gets loads of money from tax payers to promote this oppression.
And the swedish thing will never fly here. The customers just won't let that happen. They might not lift a finger to help the workers organize on our common behalf but watch em get off their ass to oppose any changes. And then that buckmaster guy hears some suggestion from some other man calling in on the radio show and presto, all the workers have new hoops to jump through to post on CL, like we're everyone's little monkeys.
So under the current system that the haters don't want to change, men exercise all this control over our work. Hypocrisy squared.

close your eyes and pretend I'm a girl.

  Alert Top

Durruti Durruti rating
Charter Member
15039 posts, 33 feedbacks, 56 points
03-Sep-10, 04:18 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Durruti Durruti profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "RE: Cl's new policy regarding adult services ads and criminal beh"
In response to message #10
 
   LAST EDITED ON 03-Sep-10 AT 04:21 PM (PST)
 
Um, do you somehow think it would be better if Norma Hotaling, a woman was in charge of how things ran? Quit man bashing please. It isn't a gender issuer. It's a power and control issue. It is women after all for the most part leading the anti-prostitution effort. Besides you are probably alienating some of your potential supporters here on RB.

  Alert Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

   reviews | join vip | metasearch | terms of use | privacy top | help | faq    ©2010 myRedBook S.A.