I'm going to be honest of what I'm going to say here:
I'm 25 this year.
I'm very pretty, have style and good taste.
I wish to marry a guy with $500k annual salary or above.
You might say that I'm greedy, but an annual salary of $1M is considered only as middle class in New York.
My requirement is not high:
Is there anyone in this forum who has an income of $500k annual salary?
Are you all married?
I wanted to ask: what should I do to marry rich persons like you?
Among those I've dated, the richest is $250k annual income, and it seems that this is my upper limit. If someone is going to move into high cost residential area on the west of New York City Garden(?), $250k annual income is not enough.
I'm here humbly to ask a few questions:

1) Where do most rich bachelors hang out?
(Please list down the names and addresses of bars, restaurant, gym)
2) Which age group should I target?
3) Why most wives of the riches is only average-looking?
I've met a few girls who doesn't have looks and are not interesting, but they are able to marry rich guys.
4) How do you decide who can be your wife, and who can only be your girlfriend? (my target now is to get married)

Ms. Pretty

Awesome reply:

Dear Ms. Pretty,

I have read your post with great interest.
Guess there are lots of girls out there who have similar questions like yours.

Please allow me to analyse your situation as a professional investor.

My annual income is more than $500k, which meets your requirement, so I hope everyone believes that I'm not wasting time here.
From the standpoint of a business person, it is a bad decision to marry you.

The answer is very simple, so let me explain.

Put the details aside, what you're trying to do is an exchange of "beauty" and "money": Person A provides beauty, and Person B pays for it, fair and square.

However, there's a deadly problem here, your beauty will fade, but my money will not be gone without any good reason.

The fact is, my income might increase from year to year, but you can't be prettier year after year. Hence from the viewpoint of economics, I am an appreciation asset, and you are a depreciation asset.

It's not just normal depreciation, but exponential depreciation.
If that is your only asset, your value will be much worried 10 years later.

By the terms we use in Wall Street, every trading has a position, dating with you is also a "trading position".

If the trade value dropped we will sell it and it is not a good idea to keep it for long term - same goes with the marriage that you wanted.

It might be cruel to say this, but in order to make a wiser decision any assets with great depreciation value will be sold or "leased".

Anyone with over $500k annual income is not a fool; we would only date you, but will not marry you.
I would advice that you forget looking for any clues to marry a rich guy.

And by the way, you could make yourself to become a rich person with $500k annual income. This has better chance than finding a rich fool.

Hope this reply helps. If you are interested in "leasing" services, do contact me...

J.P. Morgan CEO

2) Which age group should I target?
>>> Don't target age groups - aim for compatibility.

3) Why most wives of the riches is only average-looking?
I've met a few girls who doesn't have looks and are not interesting, but they are able to marry rich guys.
>>> Looks are subjective and you'd have to know what subjects his ideas of marriage pertaining looks.

4) How do you decide who can be your wife, and who can only be your girlfriend? (my target now is to get married)
>>> No one decides their wives and girlfriends. when it comes to marriage, dates or even affairs. aiming at rich targets is the least of your problems - just know the hunt and see if you can tame the game.

J.P. Morgan annual income maybe over $500k so dating is only functional to the state of the economy. From other investment firms like Lloyd's of London, that annual income maybe pennies so the dates are all relative. To the rest of the world, you may not be that pretty.

Thinking of American Investment (intelectually), a cost benifit analysis upon a cost benefit analysis is over analyzing an abstract supposed dual benefit with double the costs. By the end of the day, thinking of yourself pretty was a costly investment - no analysis involved. Allow him to be the judge of that.

My annual salary = $0.00 - having no cents to knowing dolor so that you may call me a rich bachelor.

spazz.key.spat.zes.s.posts.key=SpeakEasies..!!

25? Oh yeah, not interested. Age differences are going to make conversation difficult and interests or goals aren't going to match.

Arm candy? Not interested either. That is very shallow, I don't care one damn bit about that. What is so exciting? Maybe a thumbs up from some other dude or pat on the back. I don't see the need as I'm not out to impress others with who I am with. Simply don't care.

If she can't make good money on her own, she either lacks motivation, or was too lazy to stay in school or work hard in her profession.

This type of woman can't offer me anything.

While the main point of this joke is well-taken ("lease" vs. "buy"), it reads like English As A Second Language... at best!

Is it too much to ask of someone smart enough to understand depreciation that they cobble together a readable sentence?

Sheesh...

Charley

>If you are interested in "leasing" services, do contact me...

Or as with many of the RB ladies "rent" is a better verb.

-Mike Kaye

I had a wealthy friend who used to always lament "hookers and housecleaners are cheaper". He got married a few times, but his cost/benefit was a lot better in his single years between marriages.

I wouldn't bet on that.

Be the change
you wish to see