Perceived ideal age currently early 30's.

Duck----in coming

Just making the point that, yes, age matters.

Even if we're purely objectifying women (purely physically), then age as a number is irrelevant for our purposes. If for no other case, bodies age differently. Merely fetishizing on a number, is, IMO, rather sad.

Well Junior,
first off, you're liable to soon realize, that at 32, you're the odd man out here. I'd guess that's most likely the case for the hobby in general, and pretty much a sure bet among regular posters here on the boards.

Something else to think about. At the ripe old age of 32, you say you've never seen a provider over 27. Okay. You have also have implied that you have fucked some 18-22 yr olds. Okay to that too.

It would seem like you're not in the position to be much of a judge of the services of pro's 28 and older, so I gotta wonder how you can equitably compare the services and even "hotness" of these "old ladies" with that of their younger counterparts.

At 52, how many providers in the 18-22 age bracket do you suppose I might have fucked by now? What about some of the more senior members here, or the ones that have been hobbying much longer than I have? Also, by the time a guy hits fifty, there's a pretty fair chance he's been with a woman or two that's over 27.

You see where I'm going with this? Somebody 20 to 30 years your senior might just have a different take on things. You know, one of those "been there, done that" kinda things.

That said. There's plenty here that will see things your way, but maybe not necessarily for the same reasons.

Bottom line is, these guys are relating their preferences based on their experiences in the hobby. In some cases, a great deal of experience, in others, not so much, but rest assured, they all have reasons/experiences in support of their preference.

EDIT: BTW, I have only two that I would consider ATF's. One is 20, and the other is 43. What does that tell you? Anything?

I think it means I'm old and I like em all.

"There are Nights when the Wolves are Silent....and Only the Moon Howls"

Fair enough. As you said "these guys are relating their preferences" and so am I! I am just not turned on very much by "older women" in general, and no matter how good the service is if I'm paying I'd rather be with a girl that turns me on when I look at her... Maybe some day I'll see an older provider, but I have to say that the thought of flappy boobs makes me shudder.

I do agree that many of the younger providers I've seen have crap service, but dammit I'm in it to find some more good ones!

Also, really enjoyed reading your response. So thanks for that.

>> I do agree that many of the younger providers I've seen have crap service, but dammit I'm in it to find some more good ones! <<

Well there's certainly plenty of good younger providers out there, both with, and without any rankings, reviews or traceable history here. Some of my favorites are near complete unknowns. I have pretty good luck that way.

So far this year, I've only sessioned with two ladies over 22. As for the younger women, none are ranked or "famous".

For the most part, not only do I have no complaints, I'd have to say that I've been well served, and overall it has been a great value for what I get.

That's what you think...

As to the original question, I'd probably pick the older provider. I don't think the idea of hhr sessions works for me. I'm more for connecting and taking my time rather than trying to rush and finish the experience within such a short amount of time.

There's also the fact that a session can vary so much depending on your connection with each other, her services, skills and so much more.

------------------
Hope burns bright!

A note to that fact. I am hosting a gang bang next week for a 74 year old slut that love to fuck and suck and can go on for as long as the cum is flowing. You don't find many 18 year olds like that.