LAST EDITED ON 02-Nov-09 AT 02:37 AM (PST)
LE does not dictate what we can and can not do in private between consenting adults. Supposedly the electorate, the body of people entitled to vote (us), are selecting and electing persons who they/we feel most closely mirror their/our ideas and values to represent them/us within various legislative bodies.
It's those characters we've elected and sent off to Sac and DC that have been, and will continue, to write the laws that LE is sworn to uphold.
What does that tell "us"?
I guess it means that either we suck at choosing our representatives, or that we advocates of decriminalized or legal prostitution are, at least in theory, out numbered.....For now.
Or is it neither of the two, and we are simply as a matter of course, always deceived by our candidates, and subsequently misrepresented?
Everything comes in cycles. Someday legalization and/or decriminalization of prostitution will be a reality in California.
For now, it is easiest to blame the whole mess on the Religious Right. I really don't think they mind anyway.
And they'll probably take most of the heat when the government finally does get it's finger in the pie, takes over the business and fucks it up too.
.
.
EDIT: I liked this guy's comment down the page from the article.
"Is everyone on here retarded. Does anyone not see the biases inherent in an open poll that is not performed based on a statistical representation of the population. Although I agree with the majority of those who participated I can't stand bad science/statistics."
Posted on 08/09/2007 at 8:08:00 AM