RedBook
EscortsPremier Adult Entertainment Community Home | Ads | Message Board myredbok
Subject: "Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
printerPrinter Friendly view     picviewPic view    
Conferences > Northern California > General > Topic #43011
Reading Topic #43011

strokersteve click here to view user rating
Member since 20-Aug-09
507 posts, 14 feedbacks, 26 points
27-Oct-09, 10:31 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to strokersteve Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
 
I have left reviews for some providers and some I haven't.
I feel like if the get together wasn't worth the good word or if it wasn't a bad experience I might not leave a review.
I've had alright sessions with some providers that I haven't reviewed.
Is it wrong for me not to leave a review after I see a new provider?



Plenty Fish In The Sea

  Alert Top

 
Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Cheers click here to view user rating
Member since 22-Dec-07
1099 posts, 27 feedbacks, 44 points
27-Oct-09, 10:42 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Cheers Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 

I am with you on your thought. I only post minis on those that I want to repeat as I want to ensure she is still around for my repeat session. If it is less than what I expect, then I will not leave any comments as it is a YMMV thingy so as not to destroy her source of income. What is not good for me may be good for others. This is what it is. Cheers

  Alert Top

jsthavnfun click here to view user rating
Member since 12-Jul-08
3279 posts, 52 feedbacks, 101 points
28-Oct-09, 06:06 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to jsthavnfun Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #1
 
I'm still looking for the 'mini' review section, for the life of me I can't find it??

I'm jsthavnfun so don't get your panties in a bunch....ok?

  Alert Top

noworeezm8 click here to view user rating
Member since 13-Nov-07
1973 posts, 70 feedbacks, 132 points
27-Oct-09, 11:36 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to noworeezm8 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 
I imagine your thoughts on the subject will be changing and going back and forth a little over time. Some times it will seem worthwhile, relevant, or important, sometimes it won't. Sometimes it's just piling on. I don't review more often than I do, and only very rarely have I reviewed someone I know well.

It ain't like we're judging livestock here, so I personally don't set any hard and fast rule for when I do, and when I don't.

Just go with your gut. All the advice in the world isn't likely to make you go against it anyway.

  Alert Top

sjmedic2003
Member since 23-Jul-08
28 posts, Rate this user
28-Oct-09, 08:59 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to sjmedic2003 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #2
 
Sometimes I have been asked NOT to give a review, because the girl doesnt want overexposure, or LE having interest in them in particular. I do ask them if they would like a review...if it was good, I reflect that. If it was bad, I reflect that too. All depends.

  Alert Top

BigBill click here to view user rating
Charter Member
669 posts, 5 feedbacks, 10 points
28-Oct-09, 10:20 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to BigBill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "To reveiw or not to review, that is the question."
In response to message #0
 
   I write reviews for three reasons. First, to give my RB brothers realistic information about providers. Second, to give back to ladies that have given me good service. Lastly, to allow me to read the reviews of other hobbiests. Based on those reasons, my decision on whether to review or not goes as follows.

If it was a bad session (very rare for me because I usually stick to well reviewed ladies) I will post a review. Keeping silent lets her sucker in more hobbiests, causing them to waste their money on a bad experience. I do use a different handle for most of my reviews to avoid any drama when I do post a less than stellar review.

I will almost always post a review for a provider that does not have many reviews, unless the session was good and she indicates that she does not want a review posted. It is really important to post if the lady has no reviews. If you TOFTT, make it worthwhile by letting guys know what to expect.

If the session was exceptional I will post a review (with her permission), and if I got a high mileage session I will ask her if there are any specifics she'd like me to omit to avoid having others expect the same.

I will not write a review if the provider is well reviewed, my experience was in line with the other reviews and I'm don't need to add to my time bank. If it isn't going to help anyone, then I don't bother.

  Alert Top

NealDown click here to view user rating
Member since 25-Apr-06
5689 posts, 47 feedbacks, 89 points
28-Oct-09, 10:22 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to NealDown Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 
In general I feel that any provider that regularly runs ads and/or has a website should be reviewed no matter how great or not so great the session was. That is the whole idea behind RB. We share intel and, in return, get good info from other guys so that we can minimize the risk of seeing sub-par (or worse) providers or ones who don't provide the services we're looking for. Not reviewing a great new provider in order to keep them for yourself is both selfish to fellow hobbyists and harmful to the lady who is trying to make a living.

There are exceptions. If I session with a provider with tons of reviews and I have nothing new to offer I don't feel bad if I get lazy and not post a review. If a provider specifically asks me not to review her I'll respect her wishes as long as the session was good. I won't honor that request if I felt that that the session didn't live up to prior reviews, her pics are total fakes in a bad way, she has health or emotional issues that I feel need to be known, and/or she didn't provide advertised services.

  Alert Top

BlueLantern click here to view user rating
Member since 13-Jun-09
164 posts, 5 feedbacks, 9 points
28-Oct-09, 10:30 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to BlueLantern Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 
I kind of feel that due to the nature of Redbook, we are encouraged to share our experiences, whether it's in reviews, mini review posts on the forum, or through replying to threads or questions.

Sharing information whether good, bad, neutral or just plain helpful information (Is a shower available? Is her location convenient? How's parking? etc) always helps the next person in some way shape or form.

At the same time, I've also been requested by a provider not to post a review. So it's kind of a balance of listening to your gut if you have information to share, while also respecting the provider's requests to some extent.

------------------
Hope burns bright!

  Alert Top

50sguy
Member since 2-Jan-03
299 posts, Rate this user
28-Oct-09, 01:57 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to 50sguy Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 
I will always post a review on a provider, especially one that is new. The only exception is if she specifically asks me not to, and it wasn't a ripoff, B&S, etc. Then I definitely would regardless of whether she asked me not to or not. I am thankful for all of the great reviews on this site and believe that if you use the site to determine who you will be seeing, then you have an obligation to submit a review and add to the general knowledge base. For the record, my next review will be my 100th.

"God knew what he was doing when he created Women"

  Alert Top

ngsfmale click here to view user rating
Member since 19-May-03
1970 posts, 11 feedbacks, 22 points
28-Oct-09, 02:17 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to ngsfmale Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #8
 
   I ony talk when I have something to add or new to say.

  Alert Top

StrongSilentttt
Member since 14-Apr-09
120 posts, 13 feedbacks, -4 points
28-Oct-09, 02:28 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to StrongSilentttt Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #9
 
   Same for me.

(oops. even this post violates that rule! but since you asked.)

It's only a game...

  Alert Top

The7thStorehouse click here to view user rating
Member since 9-Jan-04
539 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
28-Oct-09, 07:40 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to The7thStorehouse Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 
   Personally, I really don't feel responsible to help providers succeed at what they do. If they want a lot of business, it's very simple: provide stellar service. She doesn't need a single review if she is a great provider. Like the voice in Field of Dreams..."if you build it, he will come"

I should also mention that we guys are very lazy about recommending someone. We worry that rates will go up or she will become less available. We also can be possessive and not want to share info with each other. That's why these girls are constantly advertising because we guys don't share info. Go look at Escort 411 and you'll see that it's a waste of time. A lot of guys asking about a lot of girls, but nobody divulging very much. It's only the bad ones that we all want to talk about.


Ironically, it's those that provide bad service that tend to have a lot of reviews.

  Alert Top

BigBill click here to view user rating
Charter Member
669 posts, 5 feedbacks, 10 points
29-Oct-09, 10:09 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to BigBill Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
13. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #11
 
   Wow, what a selfish attitude.

You don't care about the provider who gives you a great session nor about the other hobbiests who are looking for quality ladies, it's all about you.

Your selfishness is combined with stupidity.

You say:
She doesn't need a single review if she is a great provider. Like the voice in Field of Dreams..."if you build it, he will come"

How moronic. Many hobbiests won't see an unreviewed provider. The purpose of this board is to allow us to make educated choices as consumers, and a byproduct of that is that good providers get free advertising. This encourages good service because they know that there performance today may affect their income tomorrow.

Thank goodness most on this board do get it and do post reviews.

  Alert Top

The7thStorehouse click here to view user rating
Member since 9-Jan-04
539 posts, 8 feedbacks, 16 points
30-Oct-09, 06:59 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to The7thStorehouse Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
16. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #13
 
   BigBill,

I disagree with you. Most hobbiests TOFFT due to a lack of information. And having taken the risk, we don't feel obligated to make it so easy for everybody else. That's why Escort 411 is so devoid of details. And as for the reviews you read, you should bear in mind that many are bogus, written by shills, pimps and the providers themselves. Handles of reviewers are few or nonexistent in the forums, which make it impossible to check the credibility of the reviewer. So reviews are not all that important. What is important is that the provider provide stellar service...that's how she gets to be successful. I think it is important that we place (and keep) the responsibility on the provider, not the hobbiest.

I'm just telling it as it is...don't shoot the messenger

  Alert Top

pohaku click here to view user rating
Member since 25-Dec-03
5382 posts, 118 feedbacks, 210 points
31-Oct-09, 01:16 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to pohaku Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
17. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #11
 
   LAST EDITED ON 31-Oct-09 AT 01:41 PM (PST)
 
I find your POV very realistic and to the point.

There are many motivations behind writing reviews, and not all are written with naturalist's passion. ( like finding new species). Many are written by women's request and her being the editor of the review. and I am not critical of those reviewers, if you really liked the woman and would like to continue seeing her, who would say NO to that?


There are also other ways people communicate here and those are often not through reviews and I agree that if a lady is extraordinary, she will be known with or without the reviews.

Red's wisdom is to let us ( men and women) decide whether to be part of review system.

There are few obsessive ones who post reviews ( sometimes fake ones) to get few days of VIP membership, but many people would simply pay .. mostly to support this site.

I often get more relevant information through reading women's posts or IMing with her in RB chat.

To the original poster:

Reviews are written by your choice alone, write it when you are inspired. Don't worry about RB brotherhood ( often mentioned only when someone wants something from you) and they will be fine without your contributions.

  Alert Top

b3012 click here to view user rating
Charter Member
2229 posts, 19 feedbacks, 36 points
29-Oct-09, 00:00 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to b3012 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
12. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 
   nope

b3

  Alert Top

chnhnm
Member since 5-Mar-08
29 posts, Rate this user
29-Oct-09, 04:05 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to chnhnm Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
14. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 
   I treat reviews as generally discretionary.

Which is to say that no matter if it was good, ok, or bad, one should "pass the word along" to the benefit of others. *SHOULD* is the operative word I would use.

However, there have been times where, despite a BAD (or even OK) experience, I felt, for whatever reason, it meaningful to give the provider the benefit of the doubt by not posting a review.

For that matter some providers seem not to want reviews.

...

A question I have is, ...

If the provider has ZERO reviews, and you had a ho-hum experience, are you doing the provider a favor by turning a genuine post with like 6 Looks, 6 Service? (At least the provider gets something on board, so that others know it's for real?)

  Alert Top

rforre1
Member since 5-Oct-07
86 posts, Rate this user
31-Oct-09, 03:47 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to rforre1 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
18. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 
   If a provider is a scam or purposely provides a miserable service that leaves you resentful for spending the money on her, it's important to write a review to warn away fellow mongers and hopefully encourage the girl off of RB. But given everyone has bad days, chemistry varies, and YMMV, if a girl is lackluster I don't want to interfere with her livelihood and won't write a negative review.

  Alert Top

Duwop click here to view user rating
Charter Member
5396 posts, 35 feedbacks, 61 points
31-Oct-09, 11:45 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Duwop Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
19. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 

Don't be the asshole who writes one without a session.


By the way, reviews must always be *after* mmm-kaayyy??.

(fucking dumbshit, seriously, who doesn't understand this basic concept)

-- Some people are offence kleptomaniacs --

  Alert Top

strokersteve click here to view user rating
Member since 20-Aug-09
507 posts, 14 feedbacks, 26 points
05-Nov-09, 09:36 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to strokersteve Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
20. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #19
 
Thank you everyone who participated in this post!

"Don't be the asshole who writes one without a session.


By the way, reviews must always be *after* mmm-kaayyy??.

(fucking dumbshit, seriously, who doesn't understand this basic concept)

-- Some people are offence kleptomaniacs -- "

Who were you referring to Dumop?


Plenty Fish In The Sea

  Alert Top

zambi click here to view user rating
Member since 4-Apr-03
766 posts, 10 feedbacks, 17 points
07-Nov-09, 07:58 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to zambi Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
21. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 
  
I think most guys will always write a review or at least post to
forum if they have a really bad session etc. But I think when guys
have really good find for a girl who is not high volume they tend to
keep her to themselves until the rest of the mongers discover her.
They don't want her to become too high volume and/or jack up her prices.
Also the guys who find girls willing to do BBFS will keep it quiet most
of the time .. me thinks.


  Alert Top

AMPFan click here to view user rating
Charter Member
10298 posts, 109 feedbacks, 203 points
09-Nov-09, 03:59 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to AMPFan Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
22. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 
I feel exactly the same way about middle-of-the road sessions. If my review of a provider will not prompt others to see her or avoid her, and if nothing out-of-the-ordinary happened, then I consider it a waste of my time, other prospective customer's time, and RB's disk space.

One exception -- I may still review an average session if she's brand new and shows some potential.

  Alert Top

I8urpussy click here to view user rating
Charter Member
240 posts, 1 feedbacks, 2 points
11-Nov-09, 07:57 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to I8urpussy Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
23. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #0
 
I've written numerous reviews over the years and stopped doing it when I started paying for the subscription to VIP members. Obviously, creating new reviews allows you access to the VIP sections without paying for membership. However, RB would be nothing without its reviews, because we have all seen ads that turn out to be bogus ads , so the reviews are important to RB. So I say, if you see a provider, even if she is mediocre, you should write a review,

On the other hand, the only really useful reviews are the extreme ones, from people who have written numerous reviews previously. Also, I don't trust reviews that lack details. Some providers describe themselves as "GFE" but then after you get there, you find out that to her it means no kissing, don't touch me there, and about all she will do for you is a covered BJ and full sex, in missionary, but only one time and she rushes out the door after you cum.

If she did do stuff you really like, tell us what it was and why was it better, or worse, than previous providers. Also, include details because they may remind other members if they have seen the provider under another name.

I would not trust any review that says,"I am too much of a gentleman to go into details," Gentleman? Come on buddy, You are fucking whores. Also reviews that are only one or two lines long would not be useful to the board.

So my answer is you should post a comprehensive review to RB after a session. Sort of a payback for letting you browse the providers' ads and reviews.

Regardless, there will be no penalities if you post a review or not. It's totally your choice. Just like it was you who decided to fuck a provider.


-- I8URPUSSY
Speak softly and
carry a Big Dick

  Alert Top

golf72
Member since 30-Oct-02
59 posts, Rate this user
17-Nov-09, 07:48 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to golf72 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
24. "RE: Is It Wrong Not To Post A Review After A Session?"
In response to message #23
 
   Well, many of us go to RB in order to see reviews and pay back others by posting sessions..we help each other and can save $ on flakes or providers that no show.

  Alert Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

   reviews | join vip | metasearch | terms of use | privacy top | help | faq    ©2009 myRedBook S.A.