In marital relationships, the long-established rule that the child of a wife cohabiting with her husband is "conclusively" presumed to be child of the marriage is well recognized in California (Family Code §7540). In other words, a man who is not impotent or sterile, and who is married to the mother of a child is "conclusively" presumed to be the child’s father.

This so-called "conclusive" presumption may be overcome by the use of blood tests provided an application for a court order for blood tests is made within 2 years of the child’s birth (Family Code §7541(b)).

http://www.irvinelaw.com/PATERNIT.HTM

and even if you were the only one, so what? does she know your real name? aren't you using a throw-away phone? don't you park the car at least two blocks from the incall?

now, if you're dumb enough to invite her to YOUR place, then you deserve what happens.

She wouldn't need to track down dozens of guys, just the one dumb enough to do BBFS. Condoms aren't perfect, but it's all about keeping risks manageable.

>and even if you were the only one, so what? does she know
>your real name? aren't you using a throw-away phone? don't
>you park the car at least two blocks from the incall?

Do you have a California driver's license? If so, did they scan your fingerprint? Have you ever not left fingerprints behind when visiting hookers? Have you ever been booked for a non-prostitution-related crime, perhaps in a different state or jurisdiction? If so, did they collect DNA samples?

Looking into the near-future: in the health care industry, the emphasis in on cost-controls, and there's a push for portable electronic records; and considering all the security breaches that already occur with confidential/financial records (e.g. credit card numbers, social security numbers, etc.), can you be 100% sure your DNA profile cannot ever be linked to your true identity?

With today's technology and post-9/11 Big Brother looking over our shoulders (not to mention Hackers everywhere), don't take anonymity for granted. The greater your Net Wealth, the more you have to lose if you cross paths with a truly-committed gold-digger. Only the paranoid survive.

Client69

and this is not a crime scene--the cops aren't going to take fingerprints for some whore who gets pregnant.

i guess this answers my question--you guys are stupid.

I don't know, you'd better check with Boris Becker re: the latter <G>.

I'm sure that Boris thought that she swallowed.

DaiLun

While I understand the logic of this statement, I struggle to grasp the practical application. IOWs paying child support to the courts does not directly result in a payment to child (the kid is not cashing the check to it's own diapers).

The bottom line is that the person paying support really has no control on how that money is spent.

In short, it's a f*cked up and broken system all the way around. The best advice is to note that there are predators and prey in both genders. Avoid the former and don't be the latter.