Thank you for asking. SF1 gave you the answer you were looking for. Additionally there has been a lot of discussion on what information hobbyist look for in reading reviews, such as in the following link.
http://forum.myredbook.com/cgi-bin/dcforum2/dcboard.pl?az=show_thread&om=42359&forum=general&archive=#10So key things I look for in reviews:
1. She is not LE or a ROB or a dangerous person.
2. What is on the menu, i.e., DFK, BBBJ, DATY
3. Attitude, does she like providing, is her approach mechanical or passionate.
4. Any comments on pics being accurate or not.
I don’t remember the exact thread, but a well established hobbyist and I got into a disagreement on the term YMMV in reviews. He seemed to think YMMV was BS, I taking the comment that he was claiming it doesn’t exist, responded sarcastically that just because one never experienced it doesn’t mean that is doesn’t exist.
Upon further reflection, his point might have been if the experience you had may not be typical of what other hobbyist will experience, it's BS to include that experience with s YMMV caveat in your review. Most certainly, if you received a service such as a bbbj and she advertises cbj or all things covered, than you should not mention bbbj in your review. To do so would be unfair to other hobbyist in creating expectations that will not be met and unfair to the provider as it could invite boundary pushing. Regardless what terms are used, as can be expected in a very personal and intimate sexual experience, there is a wide variation in session experiences.
.............................................
Too much sex is still not enough