Nope, Peter and I are not one and the same. Please note: I'm just asking for feedback re my perception of the changing market, not advocating that you or I or anyone else lowball needy girls. I haven't read any of PeterNorth's posts, so I can't comment on whether or not he's a cheap bastard engaged in "infantile whimpering," but I'm certainly not. I'm merely noting what I've perceived over time to be a trend and asking if others share that same perception. The pursuit of paid pussy here in these United States takes place in one of the last truly free markets and, as such, it's price fluctuations over time represent trends in supply and demand that have direct significance for providers and hobbyists while also serving as an unmanipulated index of the larger economy's overall health.
You're perfectly free to pay your favorite provider $$ or more for an hour of her services. If others aren't able to afford that amount, then does that make them "cheap," or does it just represent the current fiscal reality of our current time?
Just to set the record straight here: I'm not someone that pursues girls for rent by the hour on a regular basis. Instead, I'm usually involved with one or more sugar babies who I support on a monthly basis over an extended period of time. I occasionally rent girls by the hour for variety, or if I'm in between sugar babies. As a result of not being in the market for rent girls on a continuing basis, I tend to notice differences in that market from a more removed perspective. So, before leveling judgment or coming to conclusions about others' perceived motivation, it wouldn't hurt to take the time to learn about what you're commenting on...or, if that's too much trouble, then kindly STFU!