Especially on the reviews for half hour sessions, I find it absurd that anyone complains that all they got was a fuck out of it. The fuck, generally, is the point, along with some butt and tit grabbing, etc. It's only a half hour. I think it's fairly reasonable to expect a provider to get down to business of getting the client off and out the door within thirty minutes.

Tongue kissing. Is it reasonable to get upset because someone doesn't want to have your tongue in their mouth? Myself, first of all, I do not want to stick my tongue into the mouth of someone who makes a living swallowing cock. Secondly, tongue kissing is a personal thing, an expression of actual passion. Everything is for sale in this world, but you know, ardor is ardor, and sex is well, just sex. If you really want ardor, lose some weight and cultivate it or step up to paying more for it. I think it's unfair to demand that from a thirty minute session or a $200 provider.

Sometimes, a fuck is just a fuck.

How the heck did the issue of "fairness" get into this? Can you explain? I'd be curious what your hourly rate is and what services we can "fairly" request from you? Are you aware that there are providers who do not "want to" have sex with you (as in the penetration; i.e. the physical act) for any amount of time or money but will tolerate your ministrations because nowhere else can they make that kind of money with a comparable skill set? They would object vigorously to your request to get right down to the "basic fuck". The storied AK47 was on record as saying that she paced her sessions to "keep the pumping action to ten minutes". That, my friend, is the "fair" reality. A provider has the right to set her menu and her limits and to ask for what she perceives to be an appropriate hourly rate. You are free not to see her if that does not coincide with your desires or financial prowess, so be it. Beyond that, if you pay her agreed upon rate it is absolutely fair to "demand" from her what she offered in her ad. The same way that it is fair to demand that a provider advertised as 21-25 is not an Über-Milf.

Over time, I developed a liking for certain services and not for others. So, it is now normal for me to expect certain services for a session to be judged a successful one.

Hence, when deciding who to see next, I take into consideration the services that I really enjoy. Granted, someone else may not care about the same services as I do. Also, my reviews emphasize the services that I care about most.

There is nothing inherently wrong with that at all- unless her ad indicated unrushed GFE for the 1/2 hour.

Some providers are very honest in their ads and some are horrific liars. The term GFE is now almost automatic in many ads. If it proves not to be true in session, then they all need to be called out in a review which is probably what you saw.

Now if a bad review is left because she did not perform services not advertised, then she can have the review alerted and possibly removed if she could prove it was unfair.

It is not about you. It is about what the provider advertises vs how she lives up to what she advertises. If the provider does not state in her ad that she is tug/rub or CMT only and someone shows up ready to get busy, can you see the complications there.

A LOT of women are very clear as to what they do not do (no dkf,no greek..etc) I think because it is not illegal to advertise things you do not do.

Review scores are all about expectations. If I see a woman who advertises RBGFE services and doesn't provide them with me, then points will be deducted even if it was a good session. However, I could see another non-GFE lady who provides exactly the same services as the first one, with the same performance level, and she'll get a better grade from me. Moral of the story is that truth in advertisement pays at least here on RB.

Don't agree
"I think it's unfair to demand that from a thirty minute session or a $200 provider."

Most on this board forget that there is no rule in nature that when two people fuck one of them has to pay for it. Since a whore is charging for it she can determine what she will do and how much she wants for it. I suppose the market will determine how busy she is.

This is why I stick to the sugar baby/np route, there you can get the 'ardor'

Certainly expecting the entire menu in such a short session may not be reasonable, but other thoughts to be considered in your response.

By noting your preference for not partaking in GFE

Are you married or have SO and this is just about variety?
Is this just about hitting hotties? (kind of goes along with the 1/2 hour)
If so, I can see why you may not want a GFE as you might already get that at home (or you may not enjoy 'as much').

If I were to choose, I'd prefer a longer session that allows MSOG and perhaps other menu selections, like DFK. I might also consider someone not in the $200-1/2 hour range. I also don't partake as often as in days past, so who is to say...

Different strokes, different folks (literally).

Then GFE would be what it's supposed to be