RedBook
EscortsPremier Adult Entertainment Community HOME | ADS | FORUM myredbok
Subject: "We need some 'GFE' standards" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
printerPrinter Friendly view     picviewPic view    
Conferences > Northern California > General > Topic #43495
Reading Topic #43495

bonemaster
Member since 13-Jan-10
10 posts, Rate this user
12-Feb-10, 11:57 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to bonemaster Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"We need some 'GFE' standards"
 
   I know this has been covered here and there over the years (been on the board for 10+ years but just registered)
I saw a highly rated GFE provider who advertises on this board a few days ago, and not only was she a 5 compared to a 10 in the pics, which I understand you can't put yourself together as well for every client, but the service was the main dissapointment. Being nice and sweet does not equal GFE to me. She was polite, nice, but no DFK, no DATY, and no BBBJ. And, just because I know someone will bring it up, I was freshly showered, decent looking, fit young guy.

I say, if you claim to offer GFE, you better allow 2 out of 3 of the following. DATY, BBBJ, or DFK.. and be nice, sweet, etc.
I dont know about you, but anytime I've had a girlfriend, all of that was "allowed"
What do you guys think?

  Alert Top

 
Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Looking4thebestmoderator
Charter Member
7275 posts
12-Feb-10, 12:17 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Looking4thebest Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #0
 
   >I know this has been covered here and there over the years
>(been on the board for 10+ years but just registered)

If you've been following the board for 10+ years as you claim, you must have noticed there is a Review Section. Did you read her reviews and how many stated DFK, DATY, and BBBJ ?

If you didn't read them, or if she doesn't have any reviews, difficult to blame anyone but yourself for not using readily avaible sources on the board including any 411's or VIP Escort reviews.

>Being nice and sweet does not equal GFE
>to me. She was polite, nice, but no DFK, no DATY, and no
>BBBJ.
>I say, if you claim to offer GFE, you better allow 2 out of
>3 of the following. DATY, BBBJ, or DFK.. and be nice, sweet, etc.

OK, so what lead you to believe she "was" going to offer those services? An ad is worthless for claiming anything as being available. If you are going in blind without doing the slightest amount of research, you can at least ask. Worse that can happen is that she doesn't answer.


  Alert Top

tra4fun click here to view user rating
Member since 21-Feb-07
4014 posts, 81 feedbacks, 127 points
12-Feb-10, 01:33 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to tra4fun Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #1
 
Just makes you wonder doesn't it?

tra

Your heart and soul is what I came for...

  Alert Top

IamGod click here to view user rating
Charter Member
3472 posts, 34 feedbacks, 64 points
12-Feb-10, 12:21 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to IamGod Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #0
 
   You have not been on this board 10+ years and not know GFE, RBGFE, or the most important YMMV.

"Alea iacta est!"

  Alert Top

Eddie_aka_Elvis
Member since 5-Sep-07
4369 posts
12-Feb-10, 02:03 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Eddie_aka_Elvis Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #0
 
   "I dont know about you, but anytime I've had a girlfriend, all of that was "allowed"
What do you guys think?"

A girlfriend has the HAWTS for you, whereas a provider may of may NOT have the same physical attraction. So in essence; it's hit or miss in regards to DATY, BBBJ, or DFK with a provider - notwithstanding what's "allowed" on her ad.

Thanks, Eddie/Elvis

  Alert Top

mofomonger click here to view user rating
Member since 9-Apr-08
710 posts, 8 feedbacks, 14 points
12-Feb-10, 05:05 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to mofomonger Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON 12-Feb-10 AT 05:06 PM (PST)
 
I agree...but at the same time....how much research did you do prior to booking this appt?

GFE to me means pretty much everything a GIRLFRIEND (as in GF(e)) would do. That means kissing, BBBJ, etc. What I'm seeing is some "GFE" providers consider "GFE" if they don't spit in your face.

"GFE" now is the catch phrase every provider now uses along with "5 Star Provider".

Not sure how a standard GFE can be established...not to mention enforced, but all I can say is do your research. Take every review with a grain of salt. And look to who's the reviewer. I don't trust any that haven't been members for at least a year and have a few hundred posts behind their name.

  Alert Top

tavarez click here to view user rating
Member since 9-Jul-09
594 posts, 17 feedbacks, 34 points
12-Feb-10, 11:48 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to tavarez Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #5
 
   If gfe means everything a girlfriend/so does, then I should get a bunch of bills from RAs, and not much else.

tav

  Alert Top

pohaku click here to view user rating
Member since 25-Dec-03
5831 posts, 125 feedbacks, 224 points
12-Feb-10, 06:00 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to pohaku Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON 12-Feb-10 AT 06:03 PM (PST)
 
Standard is exact opposite nature to this hobby.

If you really think about it, you would not want " standard" in any thing to do with hobby and session.

  Alert Top

bonemaster
Member since 13-Jan-10
10 posts, Rate this user
12-Feb-10, 08:13 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to bonemaster Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #6
 
   Got it... you guys made some good points. I just don't see how a provider can put GFE in her ad, not allow DATY, BBBJ, or DFK, and still receive a 10 on service. The reviews seem legit... at least be like the other providers who specifically state non gfe, and still get a 10 for service.

  Alert Top

bone69 click here to view user rating
Member since 17-Nov-06
1976 posts, 25 feedbacks, 47 points
17-Feb-10, 00:09 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to bone69 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
13. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #7
 
   GFE isn't just about what "menu" items were offered. Maybe instead of BBBJ, she delivered a "mind blowing" CBJ. I'd take that over a toothy, half-hearted BBBJ. Or she doesn't like DFK but is otherwise a great kisser (just no tongue). She may have done some other stuff not included in the classic def of GFE like coed shower, rimming and russian. Or, other than doing CBJ instead of BBBJ, she delivered an enthusiastic, non-scripted performance that made you feel like she was actually your GF. If how she made you feel during the session made you feel like a king, you could give her a 10 performance rating. So what if she doesn't DFK or does CBJ.

  Alert Top

ruggedhandsomeman click here to view user rating
Member since 22-Apr-09
466 posts, 11 feedbacks, 22 points
13-Feb-10, 10:30 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to ruggedhandsomeman Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #0
 
   Yeah hers a good standard they should all follow

http://forum.myredbook.com/cgi-bin/dcforum2/dcboard.pl?az=show_thread&om=7721&forum=soapz&archive=

  Alert Top

dangermouse666 click here to view user rating
Member since 1-May-07
1153 posts, 19 feedbacks, 38 points
13-Feb-10, 10:43 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to dangermouse666 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #9
 
was going to post the same thing. definitely on point.

  Alert Top

AsianFixation click here to view user rating
Charter Member
1042 posts, 6 feedbacks, 12 points
21-Feb-10, 05:24 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to AsianFixation Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
17. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #10
 
   Fuck that was long.... That's 20 minutes of my life, I will never get back...

  Alert Top

HighStepper click here to view user rating
Member since 26-Aug-06
7071 posts, 140 feedbacks, 259 points
21-Feb-10, 11:12 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to HighStepper Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
14. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #0
 
(been on the board for 10+ years but just registered) often gives the impression that one has been active in participating not just as a reader, but, also at least as an occasional poster. Common among existing handles that like to create new handles for whatever purposes whether with good or bad intentions.

So we now have a handle that is asking a newbie question on a subject that has been discussed Ad nauseam with so much contention and drama that a new acronym RBGFE was created to settle the unresolved disagreement of GFE.

For one to have BEEN ON THE BOARDS FOR 10+ YEARS, and asks the question asked, has gone beyond dumb, dumber, and dumbest to a whole new category of dumbness. In this new category one can be a poster child example of the joke, there are no dumb questions just dumb people.

Alternatively, one could be a sick asshole with a fake handle who likes to stir up shit. Commonly known as “shit disturbers.”

Or perhaps one misspoke in using the phrase “been on the board for 10+ years but just registered.”

So tell us which ONE are you?


Shout out to Looking4thebest, responder in post #1, who has to keep on top of these kinds of posts which can become virtual kegs of dynamite, subject to blow up in drama………………….I feel your pain bro, lol.

Also kudos to the posters who took the time to matter-of-factly give answerers to a newbie question from someone who claims 10+ years on the board.


.............................................
Too much sex is still not enough

  Alert Top

IamGod click here to view user rating
Charter Member
3472 posts, 34 feedbacks, 64 points
21-Feb-10, 11:34 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to IamGod Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
15. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #14
 
   LOL
I love you bro!

"Alea iacta est!"

  Alert Top

dong click here to view user rating
Member since 5-Dec-03
1132 posts, 41 feedbacks, 80 points
21-Feb-10, 03:38 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to dong Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
16. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #15
 
" there are no dumb questions just dumb people."

lol. I agree with Iamgod. Love ya highstepper. Gotta be a highstepper
these days cause it's gettin deep in here!

  Alert Top

RickVanWolford click here to view user rating
Member since 1-Oct-02
313 posts, 9 feedbacks, 12 points
21-Feb-10, 05:37 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to RickVanWolford Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
18. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #0
 

Seems to me that "GFE" is more about the ladies ATTITUDE and APPROACH than about her execution (skillful or not) of a set of expected acronyms.

And attitude is a very subjective quality.
Maybe that's why this debate rages on and never gets resolved.

  Alert Top

HighStepper click here to view user rating
Member since 26-Aug-06
7071 posts, 140 feedbacks, 259 points
25-Feb-10, 07:19 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to HighStepper Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
19. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #18
 
>Seems to me that "GFE" is more about the ladies ATTITUDE and
>APPROACH than about her execution (skillful or not) of a set
>of expected acronyms.
>
>And attitude is a very subjective quality.
>Maybe that's why this debate rages on and never gets
>resolved.

You are correct as to why the debate rages on and the problem is expressed in you lead sentence. RBGFE means the acronym service menu items offered and NOTHING more.
You have review menu options to cover the attitude you experienced. A “girlfriend” like experience can be felt with a woman who offers none of the RBGFE menu items.

Why people can’t understand this is beyond comprehension.


.............................................
Too much sex is still not enough

  Alert Top

camauiman
Member since 7-Sep-02
97 posts, Rate this user
25-Feb-10, 04:24 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to camauiman Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
20. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #19
 
   Read the acronym section of the site.

Go to the AAMP ads and they very carefully say GFE, a good time, vs R-GFE per the RB definition. If it is RBGFE, you get a BBBJ. Don't know about DATY since I don't eat pro-pussy. On the northern penninsula, RBGFE seems to include shower with you, rub down, RIM, BBBJ and under those circumstances I avoid DFK!!!!

  Alert Top

catlover click here to view user rating
Member since 22-Aug-03
4434 posts, 33 feedbacks, 33 points
25-Feb-10, 09:19 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to catlover Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
21. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #0
 
LAST EDITED ON 25-Feb-10 AT 09:20 PM (PST)
 
The GFE acronym should be banned entirely. It's meaningless and just causes confusion. As used in Redbook context, it refers to a set of certain specific services that can include DFK and BBBJ, etc. for example. In that case, why not just list those specific services and remove the ambiguity? I have been with many many providers who advertise "GFE" services, and besides those certain specific services, I wouldn't say at all it was like sex with a girlfriend. Completely different. The closest I've gotten to a true girlfriend experience in a pay for sex transaction have been with non-pros. That is to say, pay for sex with non-pros is the real GFE.


"[catlover is]...honest, and an asset to RB."
-ferdinand

  Alert Top

Bush_Sucks click here to view user rating
Member since 21-Apr-06
175 posts, 6 feedbacks, 12 points
27-Feb-10, 11:04 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Bush_Sucks Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
22. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #0
 
   This is a dumb argument that's been going on for years.

RBGFE = BBBJ, DATY, DFK, FS.

Anybody else who uses the term GFE without offering those things is NOT GFE.

It's pretty simple.

Bush Sucks.

  Alert Top

hornyguy
Member since 31-Aug-02
120 posts, Rate this user
01-Mar-10, 12:37 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to hornyguy Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
24. "RE: We need some 'GFE' standards"
In response to message #0
 
A whore offering "GFE" is like a mobile phone company offering "4G networking". They're both just advertising phrases. The definition is defined by the provider.

Cell phones and pussy.... yet another commonality

Shazzam, roger, wilko, over and out

  Alert Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

   reviews | join vip | metasearch | terms of use | privacy top | help | faq    ©2010 myRedBook S.A.