RedBook
EscortsPremier Adult Entertainment Community HOME | ADS | FORUM myredbok
Subject: "lambskin condoms" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
printerPrinter Friendly view     picviewPic view    
Conferences > Northern California > General > Topic #43628
Reading Topic #43628

brianavatar
Member since 22-Dec-09
19 posts, Rate this user
07-Mar-10, 10:29 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to brianavatar Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"lambskin condoms"
 
   There was a recent thread on condoms: what do people use and prefer. I was surprised I didn't see anything about lambskin.

They are my preference, but I have heard providers say they don't use them because they don't protect against STD.

So, can someone explain why latex protects against STD and lambskin does not (if this is true)?

Also, lambskin is more expensive, but the feel is good. For those who have used lambskin, what in your opinion is the most comparable brand/type in terms of sensation that does protect against STD?

  Alert Top

 
Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

bfe_4gfe click here to view user rating
Member since 24-Mar-08
2495 posts, 115 feedbacks, 214 points
07-Mar-10, 10:34 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to bfe_4gfe Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #0
 
There is nothing like skin. Lambskin is skin. That's why nothing comes close to it in comparison. Skin breathes, latex doesn't.

  Alert Top

2now1 click here to view user rating
Member since 7-Apr-07
498 posts, 6 feedbacks, 12 points
07-Mar-10, 10:39 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to 2now1 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #0
 
   Lambskin is pourous and does NOT prevent STD's. They should only be used to prevent pregnancy.

"Lambskin condoms, in contrast, are made from the oldest material on the market — the intestinal membrane of a lamb. Small pores make lambskin condoms ineffective in protecting against viruses that cause STIs. But they do protect against pregnancy, since the pores are too small for sperm to pass through. Lambskin supposedly has a more "natural" feel than latex and polyurethane, although the verdict is still out on how they stack up to polyisoprene condoms in this department."

  Alert Top

BlueLantern click here to view user rating
Member since 13-Jun-09
307 posts, 8 feedbacks, 15 points
07-Mar-10, 02:22 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to BlueLantern Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #2
 
The new polyisoprene condoms:

http://www.condomdepot.com/product/detail.cfm/pid/3281

------------------
Hope burns bright!

  Alert Top

Argo
Member since 8-Nov-02
1845 posts
07-Mar-10, 11:46 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Argo Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #3
 
Lambskin condoms are less scary to sheep when you approach them from behind. If you declare in a loud voice that you've donned a lambskin condom they instantly relax. This of course benefits both you and the sheep.

  Alert Top

Rockout click here to view user rating
Member since 26-Jul-04
33966 posts, 160 feedbacks, 288 points
08-Mar-10, 09:34 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Rockout Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #4
 
They aren't apprehensive that the rubbers came from murdered relatives?

Fascinating.

  Alert Top

Argo
Member since 8-Nov-02
1845 posts
10-Mar-10, 00:02 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Argo Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
10. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #5
 
Nah. The condoms fool them into thinking you are a ram, allowing you to turn that noun into a verb.

  Alert Top

2now1 click here to view user rating
Member since 7-Apr-07
498 posts, 6 feedbacks, 12 points
08-Mar-10, 05:15 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to 2now1 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #4
 
   >Lambskin condoms are less scary to sheep when you approach
>them from behind. If you declare in a loud voice that
>you've donned a lambskin condom they instantly relax. This
>of course benefits both you and the sheep.


LMAO! So we no longer need the velcro gloves?

  Alert Top

verse101
Member since 12-Jun-08
14 posts, Rate this user
10-Mar-10, 01:35 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to verse101 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #8
 
   Why even bother with a lambskin condom? Afraid of creating a halfbreed sheep-baby or the child support?? Just go bareback.

  Alert Top

AMPFan click here to view user rating
Charter Member
10900 posts, 116 feedbacks, 216 points
08-Mar-10, 05:57 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to AMPFan Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #2
 
> Lambskin is pourous and does NOT prevent STD's.

Still, they must be pretty effective. I mean, how often do you see sheep waiting in line at the free clinic?

  Alert Top

MongerAlmighty click here to view user rating
Member since 22-Aug-07
1837 posts, 19 feedbacks, 28 points
08-Mar-10, 01:58 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to MongerAlmighty Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #0
 
   When I used condoms many years ago, lamb skins were always my favorite because they felt great. But I always had a problem with the smell of rotting sheep guts on my unit. Unless they've changed, there was always a nasty smell on them.

  Alert Top

Masterdick1 click here to view user rating
Member since 30-Mar-07
601 posts, 19 feedbacks, 38 points
13-Mar-10, 10:19 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to Masterdick1 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
17. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #6
 
   Ditto.

  Alert Top

Inner_Dog click here to view user rating
Member since 24-Apr-05
681 posts, 7 feedbacks, 12 points
08-Mar-10, 05:06 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Inner_Dog Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #0
 
Lambskin condoms are known for their inability to stop the transmittal of STDs.

I_D

  Alert Top

10inchTim
Member since 11-Oct-09
8 posts, Rate this user
10-Mar-10, 05:14 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to 10inchTim Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
12. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #7
 
   Documented fact that lambskins do **not** prevent or protect against STD.

The Lifestyles Skin are made from Polyisoprene. Chemically, Polyisoprene is artificial latex in all regards, but it doesn't have the proteins that cause allergies. Nice thing abotu this is they also are sans the smell and taste of latex!

Polyurethane condoms are reported to have amazing heat transfer. I have tried to use Trojan Supra Condom, but these damn things have NO stretch or give. They seem almost brittle and forget any give in girth. Perhaps if they made them in a variety of sizes I could try them and offer my opinion.

!!!You should know: The risks of pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs), including AIDS (HIV infection), are not known for this Polyurethane condom. A study is being done. There are laboratory tests on this Microsheer polyurethane material. These tests show that organisms even as small as sperm and viruses like HIV cannot pass through it.!!!

Anyone have experience with a woman using the female condom? It's made of polyureathane. I found them a strange sight, but have never done the deed. I would think they look odd. (Laughs thinking "how do you wrap a hole?).

Codomania used to have this MS word file you could download and print out to size up your "situation". I thought this was hilarious and the best use of MicroLimp software I ever encountered. Having measured you could order the best size from the 155+ condom brands they carried. I even heard they could custom manufactur condoms for a perfect fit.

  Alert Top

murdoch7
Member since 20-Dec-08
549 posts, 15 feedbacks, 0 points
10-Mar-10, 02:29 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to murdoch7 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
13. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #12
 
   it may be "documented", but it is by no means a "fact".

very little science used by the pro-fag condom-industrial complex--i.e., no use of control groups vs experimental groups.

  Alert Top

Chemistry click here to view user rating
Member since 24-Jan-10
441 posts, 7 feedbacks, 13 points
10-Mar-10, 03:25 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Chemistry Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
14. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #13
 
You'll volunteer for the control group then?

Some studies are just hard to do in humans. There are serious issues of consent and ethics.

  Alert Top

murdoch7
Member since 20-Dec-08
549 posts, 15 feedbacks, 0 points
10-Mar-10, 03:59 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to murdoch7 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
15. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #14
 
   irrelevant--it is unscientific.

btw, i volunteered back in the early 90's to be a subject, and was turned down.

and i have always done it bareback and have never been std'd.

it is all a lie.

  Alert Top

escort4us click here to view user rating
Charter Member
21352 posts, 70 feedbacks, 91 points
13-Mar-10, 10:23 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to escort4us Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM  
20. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #15
 
>irrelevant--it is unscientific.
---
About as scientific as this statement:

"pro-fag condom-industrial complex"

Riiiight?


>btw, i volunteered back in the early 90's to be a subject,
>and was turned down.
---
Any wonder?

>and i have always done it bareback and have never been
>std'd.
---
So..statistically, you dont get much, so therefore...

>it is all a lie.
---
From what im reading, most certainly.


Fujiwara tofu rocks!

  Alert Top

Heinlein click here to view user rating
Member since 18-Feb-05
160 posts, 1 feedbacks, 2 points
13-Mar-10, 07:28 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to Heinlein Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
19. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #13
 
   Why would you need that? All you should really need is the size of the virus vs. the size of the pores in the condom, which shouldn't be difficult to determine. You could go a step further and pour some sort of infected fluid into different types of condoms and measure the amount of virus that manages to get through. Determining if one type of condom is better at transmitting STDs than another really shouldn't require getting a bunch of people to have sex and then later report whether or not they caught something. In fact, doing so sounds like it would be much slower and less efficient (not to mention unethical).

  Alert Top

MRPLN click here to view user rating
Member since 2-Mar-07
402 posts, 2 feedbacks, 4 points
10-Mar-10, 10:36 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to MRPLN Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
16. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #0
 
From Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condom

Lambskin
Condoms made from sheep intestines, labeled "lambskin", are also available. They provide more sensation and are less allergenic than latex. However, there is an increased risk of transmitting STDs compared to latex because of pores in the material, which are thought to be large enough to allow infectious agents to pass through, albeit blocking the passage of sperm.[33] Lambskin condoms are also significantly more expensive than other types.


MRPLN SEMPER FI

  Alert Top

captbud
Member since 12-Sep-09
8 posts, Rate this user
13-Mar-10, 12:04 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to captbud Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
18. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #16
 
The provider I see most is highly allergic to latex ( put her in the icu a few months ago) So she now uses the Lambskin.

  Alert Top

GooseMan click here to view user rating
Charter Member
587 posts, 5 feedbacks, 10 points
14-Mar-10, 07:33 AM (PST)
Click to send private message to GooseMan Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
23. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #18
 
Well, that's just plain stupid on her part. As a provider she has to worry about getting pregnant in addition to all the various STDs (which lambskin provides no protection against)...

  Alert Top

golfscotland click here to view user rating
Member since 22-Dec-04
1537 posts, 23 feedbacks, 45 points
13-Mar-10, 11:00 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to golfscotland Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
21. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #0
 
   Dupont Waterproof Spray-on vs. Gore-Tex Lining. Which do ye prefer?

  Alert Top

golfscotland click here to view user rating
Member since 22-Dec-04
1537 posts, 23 feedbacks, 45 points
13-Mar-10, 11:09 PM (PST)
Click to send private message to golfscotland Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
22. "RE: lambskin condoms"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON 13-Mar-10 AT 11:10 PM (PST)
 
And what about catgut? Will this allow me to sneek up on a tigeress without spooking her? Here Kitty, kitty, kitty.

I am fine with LifeStyles: Sheer Pleasure.

  Alert Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

   reviews | join vip | metasearch | terms of use | privacy top | help | faq    ©2010 myRedBook S.A.