That quote referring to a previous post that the girls would be LE.

I disagree. You think LE would have women walk around looking down on their luck in the hopes that they might get propositioned?

First, if they wanted to get some prostitution collars, where do you think they would use their very limited manpower, on a situation like that hoping that someone MIGHT have an idea in their head like yours AND have the balls to act on it, or use the girl as a SW in a high prostitution area? Common sense says you are 100% safe.

Second, the cops don't like busting johns. They understand that most johns are upstanding citizens and nobody is going to take seriously that they are preventing crime by busting them. And it's not productive in the overall fight against prostitution. It's like targeting the guy on the street for having a joint and ignoring the dealers, it has no effect at all outside of a tiny deterrent. Not nearly as impactful as busting a pimp or a prostitute.

And in the extremely remote chance that you happen by someone who is on the job, maybe watching someone or staking out somewhere, do you really think they are going to break their cover to bust you?

The only danger you are in is pissing off some women, which you surely will. But by the same token, you will also get some takers. And to those who think that makes you a predator...I don't get that. You're not forcing them to do anything, they are taking part in the transaction because they want the cash. They need the cash. That you are a predator presupposes that you are otherwise obligated to give them the cash just because they are down on their luck, or that they don't have the right to do whatever they see fit in order to make money to survive. It's a pretty Ivory Tower view, IMHO.

I didn’t mean to come off sounding ultra moralistic. Two consenting adults who engage in a mutually advantageous situation when the opportunity to do so occurs, is not what I’m talking about.

It is a consistent pattern of seeking out women who you know to be in desperate situation and exploiting them for sexual activities that they would not otherwise engage in is when one starts down the slippery slope. We all have heard about the boss who pressures female employees who desperately need to keep their jobs, the landlord who pressures a female tenant to avoid eviction, and so on.

The OP’s fantasy is more at just throwing it out there to see if there are any takers when a potential opportunity presents itself. But it can lead to a form of trolling with the power of money to catch the desperate fish.

There is a question of motivation as to why this approach rather than seeing a SW or provider who has already made the conscious decision to play for pay. Is it a sense of power, a better deal in getting more time and service for less money, etc.?

Too much sex is still not enough

First, I'm afraid that the chances that LE would waste resources by having broke looking chicks wandering down the road are, approximately, zero. And that is good to three decimal places... I mention this not to be contrary, or "right", but because it is important for people who are making decisions about things to start with accurate premises.

Second, with about 100% of SWs, and 65+ percent of escorts, you are supporting either a pimp, a hard drug addiction, or both. Now....man is the animal who has the ability to rationalize. And I'm sure I do my share. but by any objective or reasonable definition, you are "exploiting desperate people" when you use their services. I'm not crazy about that....but I can live with it. I try to be realistic about these things. I also try and treat hookers well, even if there isn't an immediate sexual payoff. See? I can rationalize with the best.

And don't think AMPS (or AAMPS) are the answer. Sexual slavery is very common.

_____________

FriscoJack

I read the entire thread and the word "predator" stuck in my head, so I used it. I just realized now that it didn't come from one of the other posts that I was taking issue with. Sorry for the confusion.

It's a hooker board, not a "civilian target of opportunity" board. I guess you don't know the difference either.

Oh and if not thinking that every woman is a P4P candidate to be exploited is your idea of "high and mighty", then I'll take that as a compliment.

DaiLun

As for the other concerns, this is exactly the kind of input I was looking for. Who knows what trouble I might be letting into my car.

Actually, if those videos were what they pretend to be, the strikeout rate would be closer to 999 out of 1000. They are clearly staged, meaning the girl has already done the paperwork, proved she is over 18, etc. and then they put her on the street or in the park and pretend to come across her.

The odds in this case will be much better than two guys with a video camera asking to have sex with the hottest girl they see.