LAST EDITED ON 23-Jun-10 AT 09:03 PM (PST)
>He still would have got his ass kicked.maybe not. certainly not because we're more moral, but still, maybe not (read on for a different take, if you care to).
> My main point in
>the so-called "bad uncivilized" Thai debate.
>
>The victim would have legal recourse here but there are
>still events in our nations history past and present where
>the victim didn't get justice.
yes, fools and shitheads exist everywhere. it's not like our dna is (drastically) different than that of Thais. it's human nature not to use your brain beyond what's necessary. if you use it just for the sake of using it, you're the exception.
i'm not disagreeing that by reversing the conditions, you couldn't find a group of white trash rednecks that'd beat on the guy with colored skin (or at least want to).
my point being that _today_ in the USA (not 1950 in the USA, nor 2050 in Thailand... today here, today there), it's likely they'd face both criminal and civil procedures, and lose. as would the bar owner, even if he wasn't involved (for not stopping it, and for serving a person who was already drunk).
my other point being that because they wouldn't get away with it,
it's less likely to happen
(not because the white men would be any less like animals) -- even racist assholes are smart enough that they don't want to become prison bitches.
and my final points being (stereotypes & exaggerations that are rooted in truth)
1) we think about things more here, beyond answering the question "how can i get something to eat today?" and
2) we have rule of law, thailand pretends to have rule of law.
both of those things are cultural differences that reverberate throughout our society with many different repercussions.
for example, people don't go around the USA saying "you think too much," and no thai has ever won a nobel prize (and when one finally does, it'll be one of the worthless ones... peace -- highly subjective & political -- or literature, which these days is just rotated amongst 3rd-world nations).
---
obligatory mention of whores