>>>Mechanic gloves.
>>>
>>>http://www.415clothing.com/shopMain.do?categoryId=607&parentCategoryId=600
>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.motorcycle-superstore.com/1/1/37/1738/ITEM/Joe-Rocket-Suzuki-Mechanics-Gloves.aspx
>>---
>>Ya..mechanics glove are not riding gloves.
>
> ********************
>
>Okay, tell that to everyone who wears them.
---
Thats not my job. They can be fuckups all on their own.Why is this MY problem stella? Why are you yelling at me for pointing out the obvious..mechanics gloves are -not- acceptable riding gloves. Just because some people do it, doesnt mean they'll have any fingers left on that stump if they drop the bike on to the concrete either.
I see this at some MSF classes, where someone wants to argue about using improper methods or gear use, because someone SELLS it at a motorcycle shop.
>However, I'd be interested in seeing anything you can
>provide which supports your "pressure point" theory in
>regards to wearing a beanie under all helmets.
---
SFI, DOT, and SNELL testing standards would be a great start for you stella. Most of these standards organizations specifically state, that the use of any accessory in or with the helmet invalidates all representations of safety, compliance, or function WRT their certification. Even the painting of some helmets, can harm them.
You need me to google those? Your squid friends are not the experts..neither am I, which is why I rely on experts.
Remember, I work on an EMS crew at a race track...we're _pretty familiar_ with how safety gear fails when its put to use. We see a lot of it.
Not surprisingly, a lot of these failures are on bike track rental days where people have ill fitting helmets and end up concentrating pressure on certain parts of the skull or jawbone in an incident. At times, some have had their helmets slip off halfway in a crash, because of the skullcap underneath allowing room around the lower part of their face..to rotate. This is especially prevalent on bicycle riders when they drop..not much holds it on, and raising the shape of the helmet off the head with a cap gives it the leverage to remove itself upon impact. The 'head form' is the area inside the helmet at which very specific safety testing is performed. Head socks/caps alter the head form fitment dramatically. This is measured about 40mm from above your eyebrow, to 40mm above your ear lobe, and straight to the back of your skull from there.
Everything above that imaginary line, is life critical in helmet fitment, use, and testing.
Check the helmet instructions as well, they clearly state NOT to wear anything under the helmet for these reasons.
A cap under a helmet, even a very thin one...raises it off your head, and reduces protection for any point under the level about the top of your ears. The same can be said when the inner liner has flattened out, and the helmet now rides too low on your head. A properly fitted helmet fits best on about day 20 of owning it, and goes slooowwwwlllyyy downhill from there as the polyfoam slowly collapses and degrades from time, its use and oils from your body. This is why a brand new helmet out of a box today with a Snell2000 date, isnt acceptable for race use. They age.
Forehead, upper and lower jaw, temple...they all have less protection, a higher G load impact because your head has room to accelerate INTO the helmet on impact instead of testing on the helmet padding.
A properly fitting, properly vented (for your comfort) helmet is not too hot in summer, or too cold in winter.
Now..the throat socks, are not bad at all, but they dont interfere with the helmet either.
PS: What bike do you ride?